However, many people say that the times are progressing and our aesthetics need to follow up. Change is understandable; But here, I want to say, are these pictures really suitable for children's textbooks, not to mention aesthetic problems? Let's take a good look at these pictures and know their thoughts: wearing five-pointed star clothes, wearing a red scarf, sticking out your tongue, looking at children's eyes and expressions, and having some provocative psychology and disdain. The little girl in the picture is wearing a pink miniskirt and a rabbit's ear hair band, but black stockings on her legs? In my opinion, this is not an aesthetic problem at all. This is just a matter of value orientation and ideology.
What's even more infuriating is that many children in textbooks are dressed in stars and stripes. Don't our vast China have clothes that meet your aesthetic standards, but should wear clothes with obvious implications?
Seeing this style of painting has aroused my great concern for the aesthetics of our children. Children have accepted this aesthetic since childhood, and even contain some obvious "meaning". Such a picture makes us wonder how they passed the trial.
With the growing fermentation of this matter, the official of the People's Education Society has also responded, saying that it will make corrections, listen to opinions with an open mind, and has begun to redraw. As this incident intensified, the official of the People's Education Society also responded, saying that it would make corrections, listen to opinions with an open mind and start redrafting.
Although the publishing house responded in time, the public's doubts and anger did not disappear. The response and explanation of PEP immediately triggered a new round of hot discussion among netizens. Some netizens said that this is not a matter of painting style. Some netizens also said that the People's Education Edition primary school mathematics textbook is not a problem, but many problems.
What responsibility should an illustrator take? Content creation is the responsibility of the creator, and design and painting should be the same. The painter is responsible for drawing the part, and the approver is responsible for approving the part. Wu Yong Design Studio, the illustrator who clearly signed the textbook, kept silent and said nothing.
Textbook Bureau has clear management measures for primary and secondary school textbooks. 20 19 The Textbook Bureau of the Ministry of Education issued the Measures for the Administration of Textbooks in Primary and Secondary Schools, which also has specific requirements and norms. In this regard, Xiong Bingqi, an expert in the field of education and president of 2 1 Century Education Research Institute, said: No matter whether the cover and illustrations are good-looking, everyone will have different aesthetic feelings. He also said: we need to create according to the content, we need to be proactive, and the review process of teaching materials is very strict. Some lawyers also said that the content of picture books will have a subtle influence on children, and creators should bear more social responsibilities. Therefore, while improving the level of artistic creation and cultivating children's aesthetic ability, we should also strictly control the content of picture books to avoid misleading children. In this regard, I want to say: I hope to review it strictly, so that all our parents can see your determination to "set things right", and I hope that the textbooks will get better and better in the future!