Before Xiao Xin jumped into the river, she wrote a letter, in which she explained her thoughts and reasons for wanting to end her life: besides feeling the pressure of studying, there were also emotional factors. The letter said that I was harassed and threatened by my ex-boyfriend. I recorded that I was harassed and? Temporary compromise? Related processes.
Xiao Xin's mother thinks that although Xiao Xin didn't write clearly? Compromise? Specific circumstances, but she thought that her ex-boyfriend had sex with her against Xiao Xin's wishes, so she took Xiao Xin's ex-boyfriend to court. But in the end, the police decided not to file a case. Xiao Xin's mother was puzzled and said that she would continue to appeal.
So is Xiao Xin's ex-boyfriend responsible for her drowning? I don't think it is necessary, because the danger is caused by herself, and the ex-boyfriend has fulfilled his obligation to help. There is no direct evidence to point to the ex-boyfriend. In this regard, I have the following views:
First, the danger is of her own making. According to the police report, Xiao Xin had no valium and other drugs in his body, which means that Xiao Xin was awake when he jumped into the river, and she could foresee the consequences. Therefore, Xiao Xin created the danger of jumping into the river and drowning himself.
Second, the ex-boyfriend did his duty to help. When her current boyfriend realized that Xiao Xin was in danger, he chose to call the police, which was to fulfill his legal obligation.
Thirdly, there is no direct evidence to prove that the letter left by her ex-boyfriend Xiao Xin is the reason for Xiao Xin's mother's appeal, but the letter says that emotional problems are only part of the reason, and the letter does not clearly point out that her ex-boyfriend caused or instigated Xiao Xin to jump into the river. Although cruel, from a legal point of view, ex-boyfriends are not responsible.
What do you want to say about this? Please tell me in the comments section.