First, those seemingly irrefutable stone tablets engraved with "XX commonly used by King Wei Wu", if the owner of this tomb is really Cao Cao himself, won't he know what he used when he went to the underworld? I need to put up a sign to mark it. Oh, this is what I used to use. . . This loyalty is very similar to the exhibits in the museum. It is likely that Cao Cao gave it to a minister, who took it underground after his death to show his respect.
Second, the wreckage is wrong. According to records, only Mrs. Bian was buried with Cao Cao, but there were two female bones in West Gaoling, the age of which did not match that of Mrs. Bian.
Thirdly, Cao Cao advocated thin burial before his death, saying that his tomb "contains no treasures", and his son Cao Pi fully abided by this will, but found many jewels in Xigaoling, including pearls and agates.
I really want to make sure that I still have to find the bones unearthed from Cao Zhi's mausoleum or the direct descendants of Cao Cao who can prove it, but it's true. 195 1 year There are files in 28 human bones unearthed from Cao Zhi's mausoleum. It is estimated that when the keel was used as medicine, no descendants of Cao Cao could be found after more than 1000 years. To say the least, even if both are found, they may not be tested. Who can prove that the "Mausoleum of Cao Zhi" dug by 195 1 really belongs to Cao Zhi, and that the bone really belongs to Cao Zhi, not a grave robber? After more than 1000 years of national integration, it is bound to be very difficult to identify the DNA of his descendants and this ancestor. This does not mean that the Y chromosome has the unique characteristics of Genghis Khan family.
In a word, it is still too early to find Cao Cao's tomb, and China's current practice is not worthy of the rigorous archaeological style.