First, the death penalty was upheld.
Because the case of killing his wife and dismembering his body in Hangzhou was extremely bad and had a great impact, it was a major vicious criminal case, so the death sentence was upheld, which was also the will of the people. It not only safeguarded the fairness and justice of the law, but also reflected public opinion, because such a person, if he was allowed to live in the world, would be unfair to the normal people in our society now, and its impact would also bring great negative significance. Therefore,
Second, the judgment is the will of the people.
Because the murderer in this case, he not only brutally killed his son and wife, but also dismembered the body by extremely cruel means afterwards, trying to hide it just to get a large sum of insurance money. This is a very bad criminal case, which has far-reaching social influence and brought many negative effects in society. Now many people in the society are discussing this matter and paying attention to the trial of this case. Everyone expected the murderer to be executed on the spot as soon as possible, so the trial result also upheld the original judgment and reflected the public opinion of the broad masses.
Third, the final judgment protects human justice.
Because we are advanced primates like human beings, he is very different from other animals, not only because we have compassion, but also because we have our own language and wisdom. In addition, we have our own bottom line, and we have our own double standards of legal and moral constraints. The case of killing his wife and dismembering her body in Hangzhou not only violates some human bottom lines on the moral level, but also breaks through many legal provisions. Therefore, he was finally sentenced to death, which still safeguarded human justice.