Perhaps as a person who knows historical facts and knows nothing about history, I'm afraid my feelings about this film are different. Some people will feel groggy for four hours, but people who come into contact for the first time may be extremely surprised. As a person who only knows Caesar's deeds, I still appreciate the first half. Why? Narrating boring history, using facial expressions to express plane characters, combining political struggles, political marriages and personal feelings, seems to have no subtle description and close-ups, but from dialogue to expressions and plots, history is unfolded in this way. It seems to be magnified, but it is not magnified. Just as Cleopatra hid behind the peephole in her eyes, we were watching a huge performance. Undoubtedly, actors and scripts have made soul-like contributions here. There is only one protagonist. Her beauty, wisdom, sexiness and charm are all eye-catching. She is so clever and tenacious. She inspired Caesar and Anthony. Her love and dreams didn't crush her charm. Her pride and sadness make her great, but she is a great woman. Don't forget, she is still so cute. Just like the look on her face when she first rolled off the carpet, and the blink of an eye when she bowed to Caesar in Rome. Her every step is firm and powerful, and she goes straight to the goal. Calling it Cleopatra is a historical narrative, not a real performance in the film. I can't see her debauchery at all. She relies on sexy makeup, not the charm of being an emperor and queen. What she did stems from her pursuit of love and her contribution to the Egyptian nation. She defeated Anthony, she stepped on Octavian, and she conquered Caesar.