Because Mercedes-Benz traveled 6000 kilometers, the engine was scrapped. Later, the manufacturer asked her to replace the engine at her own expense. In recent years, incidents about automobile rights protection often occur. Many people say that when defending rights, they can't get the protection that manufacturers deserve. It is really difficult to defend the rights of cars now.

According to the rights-defending woman, he saved four years' money, bought a Mercedes-Benz Gla200 on 20 1918 October, and finally spent 230,000 yuan on this car. However, I didn't expect to buy a car for less than a year, June 6, 5438+00. On that day, the rights activist said that when she drove out in the morning, the engine compartment of the car made a huge noise. Then,

Later, the woman got off the bus and walked around the car for a week. Nothing unusual was found, but the leaking liquid began to drip under the engine compartment. After contacting the after-sales, the rights-defending woman arranged a trailer to drag the car to the 4s shop for inspection. On June 65438+1October165438+1October, the 4s store informed her that the engine had traces of water, and there was no warranty in the store, so the engine needed to be replaced by itself. The engine needs at its own expense 13. The owner said that from August 12 to August 10 10, the vehicle did not have any trouble lights or any trouble tips. After driving 6000 kilometers, I didn't even do the first insurance, but now I'm told I don't even have a chance to guarantee it. On June 16, the 4s store called again to inform the manufacturer.

I think whether the engine is caused by an unknown object or not, I think the manufacturer should replace it and must give the consumer a reasonable explanation.