Current location - Plastic Surgery and Aesthetics Network - Wedding supplies - Do you dare to send bad reviews after the "vegetable paste" incident in Shexian County?
Do you dare to send bad reviews after the "vegetable paste" incident in Shexian County?
For this detention case in Shexian, the author has two meanings.

First, interests are corrupt. The media report wrote: "The Chengguan police station in Shexian County also received another alarm, saying that someone was spreading it on Baidu Shexian Post Bar and Sohu. Com, WeChat group and other networks, saying that "the restaurant of Shexian New Hospital is poor in quality, expensive and small in quantity, or is it a people's hospital? "This headline post had a bad influence on hospital work." As a result, the police responded quickly and detained the poster. Here, the author wants to ask: Is it "someone reporting" or "acquaintances greeting"? I'm 200% sure: there are more than one or two posts reporting official corruption in Shexian county through the Internet. Why haven't you seen the rapid and powerful action of Shexian police? A relatively monopolistic industry like local hospitals has high prices and poor quality, which is more than rice. The patient's unbearable feeling exists in every part of the country. Shexian county public security organs used "someone reported the case" as an excuse. Don't they think they are stupid? Excluding all kinds of excuses and excuses, the only credible reason is that the hospital leaders persecuted the poster with the law enforcement power of the public security organs. Behind this borrowing power is undoubtedly a real interest transaction.

Second, set an example for others and create harmony. Please pay attention to the political background of detaining the poster in Shexian: "Work hard 100 days to make Shexian more harmonious and safe. The Shexian Public Security Bureau put the spirit of the second (enlarged) meeting of the 13th National Committee of the county into concrete work, unified thinking, carefully organized and acted quickly. Recently, it successfully cracked two cases of fictional facts, network communication and disturbing public order. -Do you understand? Under the guidance of the spirit of a meeting, Shexian police detained and punished the supervised citizens to create a harmonious atmosphere. What is "harmony"? With all due respect, in the cognition of many local governments, ordinary people have already completed the task of creating a harmonious society as long as they bow their heads to eat and bury themselves in sleep. The way to create harmony is to eliminate all unpleasant sounds and behaviors that are contrary to the spirit of the meeting. As for whether the people are really satisfied and really recognized, creating harmonious content is not an option. Let me talk about a video that was circulated in the WeChat circle some time ago: It goes without saying that a leader went to a certain place to inspect, washed the ground with clean water, set up roadblocks, and opened the way for the leader. What annoys people is that an old man who lives across the street was blocked by a roadblock set up by the police for a long time. Even if the old man argued, it would be of no help in the end. Yes, the roads are clean and pedestrians are obedient, but can this prove the local harmony? I think the real thing is just the opposite. Under this artificially created harmonious skin, there are often more dangers lurking.

Looking at all kinds of stability events, I think many people will have such worries and thoughts: under the background of the integration of the Internet into the lives of ordinary people, will the next person be detained, sentenced and maintained? Who let law enforcement agencies bend the law and be willful? Here, I am not qualified or dare to discuss the purpose and feasibility of various network regulations? But one thing must be understood: are these net rules only for ordinary people, or are law enforcers also included?

After the appearance of the new regulations, there have been many cases of being arrested for posting. However, the name of detention seems surprisingly consistent: "spreading rumors and disturbing social order." It seems that "disturbing social order" is a big pot, and everything can be put into it. I think that when a country's law is like a simple vessel, it is not only the mental retardation of law enforcement agencies, but also the sorrow of the law itself. That is to say, taking the above two cases as evidence, the result of the poster's detention is not the poster's own fault, but because the poster's strength is not enough to compete with the strength of law enforcement agencies, and the law enforcement agencies innocently enforce it in the name of "law enforcement". In this way, the goal of "the Internet is not a place outside the law" is very clear, and law enforcement departments can completely stay outside the law or even override it.