What do you think of crosstalk performer Li Wenhua?
Mr. Chang Baohua talked about Mr. Li Wenhua's three opinions, which were basically superficial. But one sentence impressed me deeply-"Li Wenhua is too loyal to cross talk." I think if I were Mr. Li, I would be very happy to hear this evaluation. Mr. Li Wenhua loves cross talk, loves to study cross talk, and loves to talk about cross talk, more than many actors. It's normal where a fan comes from. In addition, Mr. Li has a good human nature, is modest and generous, and is well-known. All this must be admired and revered. I want to sing a little disproof about teacher Li's cross talk. I think the evaluation of Mr. Li for a long time is not accurate enough, and even exaggerated. Of course, I personally like Mr. Li's style and respect this old-timer. I think Mr. Li Wenhua's success is mainly the achievement of the times besides his own efforts. As far as level is concerned, I'm afraid Mr. Li Can is not a top player. Looking through Mr. Li's recordings, it is not difficult to find that no matter whether he measured the power for Liu Baorui in the early days or for Ma Ji, Hao Aimin and Jiang Kun later, Mr. Li's tone has not changed much, and he is not good at adjusting the actors according to the teasing style. This kind of actor depends on whether he can catch up with the real right opponent. Technically, Mr. Li is steady, sincere and talented, but he has to say that there are major technical shortcomings. Probably because of the relatively fixed tone, he often takes half a beat when he picks up a joke. He often eats too much and vomits too little, so he feels broken listening to the rhythm. Especially when I measured Liu Baorui's works in the early days, I was probably still young. This shortcoming is obvious. When measuring Ma Ji. In addition, Mr. Li speaks at a relatively even speed, and sounds almost the same in his thirties and sixties, but to catch up with a few quick jokes, sometimes it is inevitable to involve a teasing style. But this is a matter of style, not a technical shortcoming.