Blue Arc's infringement is mainly due to "1976 contract". The contract was signed by Simbert, president of Cai Yao Company in Thailand, and Yuangu Company? The main content is to transplant the copyrights of nine films, such as Ha Numan and the Seven Altmen, The Story of the Giant and Jumborg Ace, Altman the Cosmic Hero, Severn Altman, Jack Altman, Aesop Altman and Ultranman Taro, to Simp indefinitely outside Japan. .

But in 1996, Yuangu discovered that the contract was forged. Take Simbert to court. And Simport sold the copyright of these works to Blue Arc? So Yuangu officials don't recognize this contract? However, both Japanese and China laws recognize that this contract is valid. ? But Thailand's judgment is that the contract is invalid. So Simbert went to prison (ps: Judge China, who was originally sentenced, has been arrested for corruption), so the animation made by Blue Arc has no legal problems.

So we assume that the power of attorney of Blue Arc is valid? But the blue arc is a propaganda film, which has been infringed! Why? Because blue arc's power of attorney does not mention editing rights. The right to edit is the right to create original new works, and Goodbye Altman is the original new works? This alone constitutes infringement. The following are other infringements authorized by the nine works in the local area. They didn't pee.

There is no Ou Bu in the power of attorney, so a propaganda film of Blue Arc has been infringed in many places, not only Yuangu, but also the up owner and even the Japanese band. It is said that bgm in the promo is also a prelude to a Japanese singer's song. I can only say that in this case, Blue Arc has taken a bad step. Obviously, I am also a very good animation company. GG Bond's first four films, Bao Guo's special attack series, Cosmic Star God and so on are all good works. But it chose infringement, which not only hurts the hearts of Olympic fans, but also is irresponsible to its fans, which will only make its reputation worse and worse.