In the case of sufficient light: clear, the liquid crystal display effect is obviously better than 288, the color is beautiful and clear, and the color reproduction reflects the advantages of 3CCD, which is worthy of HD; At night and in low illumination: the noise is obvious. It seems that the CCD with the size of 1/6 is still inferior to the professional machine. It's much worse than my HDR-FX 1, even worse than Canon's HF 100, which is disappointing. If it is changed to manual adjustment, it can be slightly better. It seems that Panasonic's low-end machine ignores the size of CCD while taking 3CD as its selling point, and the noise control in low illumination is not so good! Photographing: Not ideal. It is not as good as the 3 megapixel Kodak camera I bought a few years ago, and it is not as good as Canon HF 100. The words on it are typed one by one! Actually, I recommend you to buy Canon HF 100.
I am a player, hehe! Lost family! Ha ha! Don't be superstitious about 3CCD! I also have Panasonic GS328 and used SD9, but I still think Canon HF 100 is good!
I am a fan from Panasonic, although I also have Sony and Canon machines! Comparatively speaking, HF 100 is better than SD! The noise control of SD9 is average!
The machine you mentioned is not comparable at the same price! In addition to SD9, it is best to choose H288 for home use and GS328 for wedding! GS328 is out of stock and the price is ridiculously high. Recommend H280! Parallel imports, 2980 done! You know, the parallel GS330 of GS328 costs 2950! No cost performance!