2. Contracts established according to law are protected by laws and regulations.
3. This contract has the following legal features:
(1) A contract is an agreement between two or more parties with equal legal status, indicating that they have the same meaning;
(2) The expression of intention of a contract is the creation, alteration or termination of the creditor-debtor relationship;
(3) The contract is a civil act.
In the contract, both parties are generally used to refer to the buyer and the seller, that is, both parties are parties to the contract.
Generally speaking, the party signing the contract is Party A and the party signing the contract is Party B. ..
6.2 Contract method The contract method refers to the external expression agreed by the parties and is the carrier of the contract content.
7. Article 10 of China's contract law stipulates that the parties may conclude a contract in writing, orally or by other means.
8. If laws, administrative regulations and rules are in writing, they shall be in writing.
9. If the parties agree to choose the written form, they shall choose the written form.
10, oral method.
1 1. Oral means the agreement reached by both parties through dialogue.
12. When the parties use the oral method, they should pay attention to the oral method only if the contract is performed in time, otherwise it is not appropriate to choose this method.
13. In the rural land transfer contract, as long as the contract is for farming, oral methods are acceptable.
14, written method.
15. The written form refers to the written expression of the agreement reached by both parties through consultation.
16. When signing a written contract, the parties should pay attention to the fact that besides the main contract, telegrams, letters and charts related to the main contract are also part of the contract and should be properly kept together with the main contract.
17. written form is convenient for the parties to implement, manage and supervise and provide evidence. This is the main method used by both parties to the economic contract.
18, other methods.
19. Generally speaking, it is inferred from daily affairs, business routines and business routines that there is a contractual relationship between the two parties. There may not be a written contract or even an oral contract, but according to business practices and business practices, the actions of both parties are enough to prove that there is a contractual connection between the two parties, which is considered as a presumption method and a presumption contract.
Legal basis:
In Article 496 of the Civil Code, standard clauses are clauses drawn up by the parties in advance for reuse, and the other party was not consulted when concluding the contract.
Where a contract is concluded by standard terms, the party providing the standard terms shall follow the principle of fairness to determine the rights and obligations between the parties, and take reasonable measures such as exempting or lightening their responsibilities to remind the other party of the terms that have a significant interest in them, and explain the terms according to the requirements of the other party. If the party providing the standard terms fails to perform the obligation of prompting or explaining, so that the other party fails to pay attention to or understand the terms with which it has a significant interest, the other party may claim that the terms will not become the content of the contract.
Article 497th of the Civil Code stipulates that the standard clauses are invalid under any of the following circumstances:
(1) The provisions of Section 3 of Chapter VI in Part I of this Law and Article 506 are invalid;
(2) The party providing the standard terms unreasonably exempts or lightens its responsibilities, aggravates the responsibilities of the other party or restricts the main rights of the other party;
(3) The party providing the standard terms excludes the other party's main rights.
Article 498 of the Civil Code disputes the understanding of standard clauses, which shall be interpreted according to the usual understanding. If there are more than two interpretations of the standard terms, an interpretation that is unfavorable to the party providing the standard terms shall be made. If the standard terms are inconsistent with the non-standard terms, the non-standard terms shall be adopted.