Second, the materials and original texts responded by all parties

Third, some personal problems.

According to the data provided by Tesla, the speed of Ms. Zhang's father before the incident reached118.5 km/h. Ms. Zhang and her family responded many times. At that time, the speed was only 60-70 km/h. As long as Ms. Zhang provided a driving recorder or surveillance video, it could prove that Tesla data was fraudulent, and its impact far exceeded the brake failure. Even if neither of them can be provided for some reason, the brake marks on the road can prove whether they are consistent with the data. Why not?

For the female car owners and their families who refused to test the vehicles, they argued that they did not recognize the testing institutions designated by Tesla. Why don't they ask for the replacement of other authoritative testing institutions? Later events have attracted the attention of relevant departments and media, which is not difficult to achieve. And you can sue and let the court appoint a testing institution.

? It's really hard to understand complaining about brake failure without mentioning stepping on the brakes.

/kloc-before April 0/9, Zhihu's speech was rational, and the support of both sides was balanced, even leaning towards Tesla. However, after April 19, there was one-sided, and neither side provided new strong evidence. Why is there such a big turning point? Moreover, praise is mostly ingenious and not objective. Even Tesla's answer was deleted?

For the data released by Tesla, there are basically two positions: one does not recognize the authenticity of the data and thinks that the data may be fraudulent; The other thinks that the pedal is hard (I don't understand, the original words are not like this) and you can't step on the brakes. These two views are contradictory in themselves. If you believe that the data is false, then you can't believe that the pedal is hard. If you believe that the pedal is hard, don't believe that the data is fraudulent. Bet on both sides, not giving Tesla a chance to explain, quite clever.

Regarding the authenticity of the data, the data is basically consistent with Ms. Zhang's description. Why can't it be because the automatic brake starts?

Because the media is quite powerful, the recent remarks made by Vice President Tesla out of context have caused another wave of enthusiasm.

That is, you can buy hot search, provide admission tickets and take care of them. It is simply an omnipotent little black, a contemporary living Lei Feng.