First, the funeral should be filial first, and the wedding first will be called unfilial and can only be done together. Since netizens think this is strange, let's talk about it. In rural areas, we attach great importance to marriage and death. Three books and six weddings and funerals are exquisite. Under normal circumstances, when an immediate family member dies, it is necessary to be filial as a living relative. Of course, this is about elders. The two people in the news did it together because his mother died.
If a funeral is held first, he will be in mourning for at least three years. During this period, nothing happy can be done, and the hard-won wedding is all for nothing. But if two things are done together, he can worship his mother at the wedding and let her see him get married, which is also a way to reassure her.
Second, in fact, this thing is very common in rural areas, nothing unusual. The above also mentioned some small things about marriage or death in rural areas. Rural people pay more attention to etiquette and filial piety, especially the people around them know their neighbors, so no matter which one they do first, someone will be sorry. In fact, it is a last resort to do these two things together, which can not only let the dead relatives rest in peace, but also be worthy of their other half.
Perhaps this thing is simply outrageous to outsiders, but for people who have seen it in daily life, doing it together is the most suitable choice, so people are not surprised at all, and even think it is a respect for the deceased.
Finally: But to be honest, if I were you, I wouldn't accept doing two things together. Weddings are noisy, funerals are crying. I can't cry if these two things are done together. So sad!