Company executives have contacted the driver and said that they know the rules of not driving after drinking. The reason why he drunk 300 meters to pick up the driver must be to drive. After all, finding someone in the parking lot is really troublesome. He didn't drive a long distance, which led to his nature is not serious, which led to the prosecution can forgive him for such behavior.
Although the law is cold-blooded, everyone should strictly follow the rules, but many times special circumstances should be taken into account, so that people feel comfortable. In many cases, it is unnecessary to make things so stiff. The court should be properly humanized in order to get everyone's real satisfaction, otherwise it will easily disappoint everyone. This corporate executive never thought about drunk driving from the beginning. He just drove the car out to wait for the driver, and there was relevant evidence to support it, which led the prosecution to definitely consider it lightly. After all, there is no substantial impact.
Although the executive's approach was wrong, it did not involve relevant regulations and did not cause adverse effects. This result is of course reasonable. I think some things should not be so routine, and humanism should be considered in many cases to make people feel caring and warm. After all, the other party has not done any bad behavior and has a good attitude of admitting mistakes. Such people deserve to be treated by law.
In my opinion, there is not much problem with the behavior of executives. It's just that drunk driving 300 to pick up the driver really doesn't have much problem, not to mention not operating on the main road. Many times, don't punish the public in an overly harsh way, otherwise it will really chill everyone's heart and will definitely make society more cold-blooded and heartless.