This kind of news has appeared more than once or twice, which is a normal state for anchors and contracting companies. From my personal point of view, we can see things clearly only by analyzing them from the following levels.
First of all: it is unreasonable for companies to defend themselves by investing in infrastructure.
After the anchor signed the contract with the company, it was found that the company's operation did not cause survival problems to the anchor as agreed before, but the company only said that the company had provided enough investment in infrastructure equipment, so the company regarded the anchor's cancellation request as a breach of contract.
But my personal point of view is that the anchor itself is an independent worker without labor tools, and the live broadcast apartment or live broadcast equipment provided by the company is the infrastructure of the company's operation. These devices are not the personal assets of the anchor, and the live broadcast is only the user. From the perspective of assets, these devices still belong to the company, so the company's statement is unreasonable.
Secondly, the final interpretation of the legal effect of signing a contract is not in the company, but in the country.
For lawyers, looking at such a signing contract, lawyers suggest that the dispute between the anchor and the company be resolved through court proceedings, because there are many illegal places in such a signing agreement, that is to say, the company will formulate some overlord clauses, which may lead to the company losing the case. The formulation and specific performance of a contract are comprehensive factors that the court will consider.
Finally, the incident reminds everyone that the contract is not signed casually, and the legal effect should be considered.
In fact, the female anchor in Hangzhou is lucky, because there are many loopholes in the company's contract execution, such as pushing money or staffing, which led to the company's failure. However, for some live broadcast companies with perfect legal system, once they sign the contract, it will be very difficult to deal with it, so the anchor should consider the legal risk cost clearly when signing the contract later.