However, if you think that an expert may be biased against your thesis or be detrimental to your research, you can take the following steps to avoid this expert:
1. Know the background and research direction of the judging experts in advance: Before submitting the paper, you can know the research interests and opinions of the experts by reading their relevant research papers or academic works. If you find that it is contrary to your research direction or has obvious prejudice, you can consider avoiding this expert.
2. Ask the tutor or graduate school: If you have any questions about the evaluation ability or impartiality of experts, you can ask the tutor or graduate school. They have experience and resources and can give you some advice and help.
3. Apply to the graduate school to adjust the evaluation experts: If you have sufficient reasons to think that an expert is unfair in evaluating your thesis, you can apply to the graduate school to request the adjustment of the evaluation experts. Explain the reasons in detail in the application and provide sufficient factual evidence to support it.
It should be noted that for doctoral dissertations submitted for review, the regulations of each school and college may be different, involving expert review. So you'd better communicate with the relevant departments or personnel of your school or college to understand the specific rules and procedures.
In a word, avoiding judging experts is a special case and should be avoided in normal academic exchanges. The purpose of academic evaluation is to ensure the quality of research and improve the academic influence of papers, which should be treated with a fair and objective attitude. If you have legitimate reasons to believe that experts may have conflicts of interest or prejudice, you can apply or adjust in an appropriate way.