The live webcast of Suifenhe volunteers to capture pets related to the epidemic caused controversy. It is right for him to catch pets related to the epidemic, but it should not be webcast. Article 42 of the Law on the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases in People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulates that during the outbreak and epidemic of infectious diseases, relevant staff should try their best to cut off the transmission route of infectious diseases, including controlling or killing wild animals, domestic animals and poultry in the epidemic areas. Once the epidemic is serious, the staff will euthanize the pet owner with his consent.

1. Volunteers should catch pets involved in the epidemic according to law.

It is normal to observe the behavior of volunteers from a legal point of view, because according to the laws of the country, if the infectious diseases in an area are serious, the relevant staff will properly handle these pets during the epidemic period, and a special class for dealing with infected pets has also been set up in the local area. If the pet owner agrees, a professional will euthanize the pet. Because the epidemic spread faster and faster, in order to complete the disinfection work as soon as possible, the volunteers also cooperated to arrest the pets that appeared in the epidemic area. However, this volunteer conducted a live webcast during the arrest process, which brought psychological discomfort to netizens, so this person was also criticized and educated.

Second, volunteers get attention online with the convenience of their work.

Because there are often videos of cruelty to small animals on the Internet, many netizens think that those cruel people should be punished by law, and the life of pets is also life. But when netizens are in a hurry, they are easily deceived by some videos, some of which are taken out of context. The volunteer did catch pets according to the epidemic prevention regulations, but he was maliciously edited and left a bad impression on others. The audience felt that his purpose was impure.

Three. Concluding remarks

The work of volunteers is very great. They have been helping others, but a few mice always spoil a pot of soup. This volunteer's behavior is not worth advocating. It is also disgusting to gain attention through live broadcast during work hours.