& lt IELTS & gt Why is IELTS 6 easy and IELTS 6.5 difficult?

According to the Southern Metropolis Daily, the list of villagers was forged to defraud the approval of the homestead, and 17 mu of homestead was sold for profit. 69 villagers 17 mu of cultivated land in Guiyu, Chaoyang, Shantou, Guangdong Province were sold for building houses and liposuction to lose weight. The local land department said in an interview that "the declaration is fraudulent" and has issued a document to revoke the approval and plastic surgery. At present, the Shantou Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection has been involved in the investigation.

Cultivated land is leveled to build houses.

Mr. Guo from Xinxiang Village, Guiyu Town, Chaoyang District, Shantou City said that before the Spring Festival in 2009, Xinxiang Village 17 mu of farmland was completed. This 17 mu is located on the only large cultivated land in the village. The construction project cut off the water conservancy facilities of this cultivated land, resulting in the inability to cultivate more than 60 acres of surrounding land. What about sagging breasts? The villagers thought this construction was illegal, so they began to petition.

The population of Xinxiang Village is *** 1900, and the villagers claim that the cultivated land is less than 100 mu, including the occupied cultivated land.

Apply for homestead under false pretence

The villagers found out from two official documents provided by Chen, secretary of the town committee of Guiyu Town, Chaoyang, that they were pretending to use about 17 mu of land in Xinxiang Village as their homestead.

A deputy director of Guiyu Town Land Institute admitted that there was an impostor in the application report, and the Shantou Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection has been involved in the investigation.

According to the registration form of new houses in Xinxiang Village, Guiyu Town, presented by Guiyu Town Land Institute, the reporter checked the list of 69 households applying for homestead in Xinxiang Village one by one, and at least 27 villagers signed to prove that they were impersonated.

The village party secretary admitted fraud.

According to informed villagers, the approved homestead will be sold privately by "counterfeiters". Buy a piece of land of 60 square meters in Xinxiang Village, and the price is at least 654.38+10,000 yuan, and the price of a piece of land adjacent to the village road is at least 400,000 yuan.

Guo Rongze, the branch secretary of Xinxiang Village, admitted that he had verified and submitted the registration form for new residential buildings in Xinxiang Village, Guiyu Town. Most of the lists were fake, and the cheekbones were plastic. Guo Rongze said that his participation in fraud is not for his own interests, but a last resort measure to ease contradictions. He said that 17 mu of land was approved by the former village Committee director. Because the whole transaction procedure is legal and the funds have already arrived in the village account, the buyer confidently requested to build a house. But on the other hand, some local villagers did object, and the two sides were at loggerheads. In order to solve the contradiction, he took the form of a fake application, hoping to solve the dispute between the two sides at one time.

When the reporter asked for an interview with the last village committee director, Guo Rongze said that the last village committee director was arrested and sentenced by the higher authorities because of economic problems.

Guo Rongze said that at present, the Shantou Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection has been involved in investigating this matter and all the books in the village have been removed for review.

Farmland needs to be restored.

Due to the intervention of higher authorities, "Chaoyang Planned Land (Land) Min [2007] 18" and "Chaoyang Planned Land (Land) Min [2007] 19" have been cancelled, and the land department also requested to restore 17 mu of farmland.

However, Guo Rongze, the village party secretary, said that these land buyers proposed that if the land they bought was to be restored to its original state, the houses built by others on farmland should also be demolished to restore to its original state, otherwise they refused.