In the film, the tiger dragged the sheep into an impossible iron fence and took them away. This is an obviously unreasonable place. At first glance, I thought it was a mistake in editing. After watching the whole film, I can conclude that I won't make such a low-level mistake.

So what should be a reasonable situation?

First, tie the sheep into the fence, then lift the second fence inside to release the tiger, who drags the sheep into the darkness and eats it. But this can't achieve the purpose that the father wants to give the child the most cruel lesson. This is not a reasonable situation.

Second, my father said that PI almost lost an arm. Then the actual and reasonable situation is that the tiger dismembered the sheep through the railing and dragged the fragments into the fence. Pipi actually saw what his father wanted to convey to him, a very cruel thing. In the second case, it makes sense. Why is Pi's memory inconsistent with the facts? Because in the face of cruel facts, Pi's self-psychological protection mechanism chose to forget, and Pi chose to forget the cruelest thing that ever happened.

PI will forget more cruel things in the future, so it will correspond to the later content in the film.

Life is all about lettering, but the saddest thing is not taking the time to say goodbye. Life is to let go, but the most regrettable thing is that there is no time to say goodbye! I don't know English, can I also translate the original into Chinglish: life is to let go constantly, but those things that hurt the most don't need to take the time to say goodbye (just choose to forget).

The diary in the sea was blown away by the sea breeze, and I forgot to say goodbye to my lover Antie. The tiger didn't look back and left without saying hello. All these metaphors indicate that Pi chose forgetting rather than remembering directly. Pi blurred the painful story with fantasy, and even chose to forget the most cruel part of the story in fantasy.