Current location - Plastic Surgery and Aesthetics Network - Jewelry brand - Why didn't the Indian maharaja resist when he was deprived of his privileges?
Why didn't the Indian maharaja resist when he was deprived of his privileges?
First, because the privileges of Indian princes were deprived, their wealth was not completely taken away, which did not have a great impact on their lives. The life of the deprived Indian princes is still rich, and the people still respect them.

Second, because Indians and China people are both farming peoples, they are not good at fighting, and most of them have a very sensitive sense of political smell. They all know that it is only a matter of time before they are deprived of their privileges, and there is no need to resist.

After 1970, the privileges of vassals were deprived and most of their assets were confiscated. At this point, the so-called era of princes and nobles in India ended. Today, more than 30 years later, the life of the descendants of the royal family has also undergone great changes: some people are down and out, some people are in the Indian political arena, and some people have become Bollywood superstars.

Extended data:

From 65438 to 0849, the British East India Company basically controlled the whole of India, and only a few areas were ruled by Portugal and France. 1857, the famous Indian national uprising broke out all over India, against the brutal British colonists, but it was quickly suppressed.

However, India also changed from the rule of the British East India Company to the direct rule of Britain, established the Indian government, and ended the nominally existing Mughal Empire. India directly ruled by Britain (called British India) is divided into 13 provinces, including Myanmar.

In addition, there are about 700 local states ruled by Indian princes under the close supervision of Britain, accounting for two-fifths of India's total area (some provinces also have local states).

References:

Baidu Encyclopedia-Land Consolidation in India