Then the merchant made an incredible operation, that is, calling the police and even taking legal action. Finally, under the mediation of relevant departments, Ms. Zhou returned the necklace. In fact, I don't quite understand the alarm of the merchant. First of all, the label is misplaced by the business staff. Then Ms. Zhou disagreed because she was afraid of being cheated by a liar. This is understandable in itself. Someone accused Ms. Zhou of not wanting to return the necklace. Then I want to ask a question, if this necklace worth 8 thousand was bought by Ms. Zhou for 80 thousand. So when will the merchant refund be delayed?
I admit that most businesses operate in good faith, but there are always a few businesses that are morally corrupt. Speaking of this topic, we still have to whip the body with the bank. If you get fake money at the counter, the bank must be a rogue after leaving the counter, saying that you are not careful. But if you withdraw 1000 yuan from the ATM, the bank will take legal action against you immediately. What is good is called overlord clause, and what is bad is called hooliganism. However, compared with merchants, consumers are at a disadvantage in legal aid and time cost. The bank will accompany you for a month, and people can still live well. If you run to the court for a month every day, your life will be out of order.
80,000 yuan was marked with a price of 1 10,000 yuan, and was finally bought by Ms. Zhou for 8,000 yuan. I really can't figure out what Ms. Zhou did wrong. Isn't it natural that you are willing to sell and I will buy it with money?