2. If there are three pirates, when the first one makes a suggestion, he knows that as long as the second one has at least one gem, he will agree, because if he objects, he will get nothing when he makes a suggestion, so in the case of three people, it must be 99 1 0.
If there are four people, then the first person must know that no matter what proposal he makes, the next person will definitely object, because if the first person is fed with sharks, then the second person will get 99% of the jewels. If you want the second person to agree to your proposal, the first person should meet at least 99% of his requirements for jewelry. Obviously, this is very expensive, so the first person will never try to win the second person's ticket, but can only please the third person and the fourth person. And if the third and fourth object, their best result is the situation of the above three people. No.3 got 1, and No.4 got nothing. So as long as they can meet the minimum requirements of 3# and 4#, they will definitely support it, so in the case of four people, the result can only be 97,0,2, 1.
There are five people in the end. For the convenience of narration, we number five people in the order of 1#~5#.
I. 1# put forward suggestions. If his proposal can't meet the requirements of two people, he will get nothing. Therefore, when he learns that if his proposal is not passed, there are only four people left, that is, the distribution scheme of 97,0,2, 1, he only needs to find any two of these four people to agree with his scheme.
So, can he get the support of 2#? If you want to get the support of 2#, you have to provide him with 98 gems, which is definitely not possible. Therefore, in the allocation scheme of 1#, 2# is the first one to be excluded. In order to meet the requirements of 3#, it is enough to give 3# 1 gem, because if the proposal of 1# is not passed, 3# will get nothing, so the minimum demand of 3# is 1 gem. As for number four, give him three jewels before he agrees. At this time, No.5 had no choice but to disagree, so there was the first allocation scheme: 96,0, 1, 3,0.
Then, if you change the scheme, you can get such a scheme: 97,0, 1, 0,2, and this scheme can also be passed. So this scheme can get 97 gems for yourself, which is the biggest benefit.
Of course, in the penultimate scheme, if you only give 4#2 gems, then whether he agrees with this scheme or not, he can get at most 2 gems, but don't forget that they are pirates. Since he can't get more, why should he care about 1#? He should oppose this proposal and let 1# die-who wants him to covet a gem and not give himself more, hehe:)
So, if my analysis is correct, there can only be one answer:
97,0, 1,0,2