Although the control is very strict now, it is hard to say if such a thing really happens.
For doctors, doctors can cure diseases and save lives, but they are not dead, and they can influence people's life and death. Of course, for diseases that have been conquered now, unless there are special circumstances, they can generally be well treated.
The problem of not being cured by spending money to see a doctor should also be considered in many ways, and it can't be all the doctor's fault.
So on this issue, the patient is unreasonable.
Of course, if the hospital induces the patient to treat the disease, but it is not cured in the end, the responsibility will be different. It is not easy for patients to get money by themselves. If he is ill, he goes to the hospital for treatment, but the hospital is not good for his illness and charges him.
This problem is naturally subconsciously attributed to the doctor, who let the doctor not cure it.
But from another angle, doctors are not gods, and it is impossible to cure all diseases. So the patient's idea itself is wrong.
Even if the patient's illness has not been cured, we should think about whether it is a doctor's problem from all aspects, rather than killing a boat with a stick. Of course, some people say that the disease is not cured. Isn't it because doctors want to make money? I don't know when this bad idea appeared in people's minds.
Always thinking about the disadvantages of others, and finally can only let yourself embark on a dark road.
Legal basis: Article 3 of the Regulations on Handling Medical Accidents in People's Republic of China (PRC) should follow the principles of openness, fairness, justice, timeliness and convenience, adhere to the scientific attitude of seeking truth from facts, and ensure clear facts, accurate nature, clear responsibilities and proper handling. & gt