We can understand the meaning of impromptu comments from the words "impromptu comments".

"Improvisation" means short preparation time. Generally, candidates will have five to ten minutes to prepare after drawing the questions. During this time, candidates need to analyze and understand the topic, fully grasp the theme of the topic, then determine the theme, conceive the structure, call the reserve and adjust the state.

"Comment" means comment and narration. Different from retelling and description, it tells not only what it has seen and heard, but also how it feels. The combination of narration, discussion and comment makes this expression comprehensive.

In the process of actual impromptu comments, we can adjust the weight contrast between narration and comments according to the topic, or more narration, or more comments, or even only comments without narration, only statements without comments.

2. Common ways of impromptu comments

At present, the review of impromptu comments is divided into "topic" and "material".

"Topic category" refers to a topic, usually a sentence, such as "How to treat left-behind children", "What do you think of" Little Yellow Car ","How do you understand "virtue and art" and so on.

"Material category" refers to a news material, explaining the background of the event, and then asking candidates to comment on the news event. For example, "Mr. Lang of Nanjing grabbed the replica of two pairs of Nike basketball shoes that Kobe wore when he won the Beijing Olympic Games at a price of 1.499 yuan each. Nike advertised in China official website that the heel of this shoe has a patented zoomair air cushion. But Mr. Lang cut a small hole in the heel of the shoe and found that there was no air cushion in it. Nike admits that this shoe is a product description error and does not admit that it is suspected of "false propaganda". (March 16 Beijing News) Please comment on the above materials. "

At present, most of the impromptu comment tests focus on social hotspots, and examine whether candidates pay attention to social hotspots, their sensitivity to news and their language skills. Therefore, candidates should pay more attention to news events and watch more commentary programs to broaden their horizons and improve the level of comments.

Section 2 requirements for impromptu comments

Impromptu comments mainly examine candidates' ability to understand, think, summarize, remember, express, observe, adapt and adjust. Impromptu comment is a difficult item in all the examination items, and it is also the item that can best reflect candidates' language ability. Generally appear in the second interview or the third type. Only by understanding the points to be investigated in impromptu comments can we understand the requirements of impromptu comments more accurately.

First, the examination questions are clear

The "comment" and "narrative" in impromptu comments depend entirely on the examinee's understanding of the topic, and whether the understanding is accurate or not determines whether the following work is effective or not.

The key to accurate examination is to grasp the appeal point of the topic, try to figure out the intention of the questioner and grasp the core concept of the topic. The examination time for impromptu comments is generally 2-3 minutes. In the limited time, we must have a theme, a clear point of view, a focused theme, and avoid pursuing everything, until there is no clear point of view in the end.

Many candidates sometimes say this point when commenting, and then say that point. There is no connection between several viewpoints, and even there are contradictions between several viewpoints. Finally, they don't know what they said. In this regard, candidates should clearly comment on the main argument, and all sub-arguments are centered around the main argument.

If the topic is beyond your knowledge, you can make some guesses literally, even if you can only say what you can understand, make comments, and resolutely avoid the situation of retreating and saying nothing.

Second, clear thinking.

Impromptu comments are similar to oral argumentations. Candidates should have a clear theme in their 2-3 minutes' comments, and grasp the relationship between arguments, arguments and arguments when commenting. Before speaking, you must be clear about what you support, what you oppose, and what your arguments are. There must be a logical relationship between the main argument and the secondary argument. The choice of each argument must serve its corresponding argument and avoid two levels or even self-contradiction.

To be clear-headed, candidates must have a clear framework when preparing for the exam. This framework is the "skeleton" of the whole review, so remember it clearly; Commentary enriches its "flesh and blood" on the basis of fixing "bones". It is necessary to remember "bones" forcibly, and at the same time think of and say "flesh and blood".