Su (1February 24th, 897-1April 2nd, 09991) is a female writer. The baby's name is Renault, little sister, the scientific name is Xiaomei, and the word is Lin Xue. Later, because she was promoted to Beijing Higher Women's Normal School, the word "small" was omitted and changed to Samui. After returning from France, he took the word Sue as his name. The pen names are Lu Yi, Lingfen, Laomei and Tianying. 1897 was born in yamen, Ruian County, Zhejiang Province. He laughed at himself for being half a Zhejiang native, originally from Xialing Village, Taiping County, Anhui Province (now huangshan district, Huangshan City). In the early 1930s, Su was once known as "the best prose writer among women writers". Except for some scenes, her prose was mostly short essays that remembered people's feelings. His prose language is lively, literary and white, which is quite interesting. Although it may not be very profound, it is quite a scholar's prose style. It's just that she has written articles attacking left-wing writers such as Lu Xun and Guo Moruo, and published anti-* * remarks, so she is not liked in the mainland.
Half-life "anti-Lu"
Su's character often shows the characteristics of "argumentative", and she has also taken the initiative to argue several times in modern literary circles. Since 1930s, she has written many articles to participate in the discussion on Li Jinfa's symbolism poems, and has had many rounds of discussions with Mr. Qin Zihao. Then, after The Eyes of Jiunaluo was published, Mr. Xiang Peiliang and I discussed the scene setting and performance on the stage of the play, and wrote Answer to Mr. Pei Liang about the play (Wuhan Daily1April 935 16). These discussions and arguments mainly focus on how to treat and evaluate literary and artistic works, which are limited to the scope of literature and art itself. It can be said that it is an academic dispute, which is two-way and reciprocal. However, the controversy about Lu Xun in the Soviet Union is quite different from the above situation. On the surface, it seems to be in the form of pen and ink, but the substance of the content is completely divorced from academics and has become a political opposition, and it is one-way. Because Lu Xun died in 1936, 10 and 19, Sue's hostile attitude towards Lu Xun began within one month after his death. Su has long opposed Lu Xun and published many articles, which is rare in history. Her views on Lu Xun, from praise to condemnation, are also well known and attract worldwide attention. As early as the 1920s, Su had no grudge against Lu Xun. 1928, she and Lu Xun attended the banquet of Li Xiaofeng, the owner of Beixin Bookstore. 1929 In May, Su called Lu Xun "the most successful local writer in China" in the article "Writing in front of (modern writers)". Later, in the introduction of Mr. Zhou Zuoren, the evaluation of Lu Xun and his True Story of Ah Q was: "He made a profound study on the morbid state of the Chinese nation" and "established many pulse cases and treatment prescriptions". In the winter of 1934, she published The True Story of Ah Q and The Art of Lu Xun's Creation (Chinese Weekly, 1 1 volume, 14), which gave high praise to the creative art of Lu Xun's novels, and made comments on two collections of Lu Xun's novels, The Scream, and. In this paper, the artistic features of Lu Xun's novels are summarized as three: "The first is the profundity and coldness of the pen ..."; The second is the simplicity and preciseness of syntax. The third is the novelty and uniqueness of the genre ... "Until the end of the 1960s, Su's article" The reason why my admiration for Lu Xun changed from admiration to opposition-commemorating the 30th anniversary of Lu Xun's death "(included in Talking about the Past in the Literary World) also bluntly expressed her admiration for Lu Xun: The true story of Ah Q really drove us crazy, and everyone held on to reading this article and criticized each other after reading it. At that time, we were only happy with the humor and wit in the article ... After reading Zhou Zuoren's evaluation, we had a deeper view of The True Story of Ah Q and felt that the novel was of high value.
So, what prompted Su's attitude towards Lu Xun to suddenly change from reverence to opposition or even hostility? In the same article, she said, "When did you suddenly change your mind about him? That's after the trend of women's normal university. Because Su and Lu Xun have completely different views on what the president of the Women's Normal University has done in the agitation of the Women's Normal University, they also have different attitudes towards Zhang, the minister of education they support. With the change of the current situation, the political differences between Su and Lu Xun are getting bigger and bigger, and the words are getting more and more fierce. It can really be said that it is "laughing and scolding, fighting and fighting." In June 1936,165438+1October 12, Su wrote "Talking with Mr. Cai Yumin about Mr. Lu Xun's book", which began her "anti-Lu" half-life. The next day, she wrote Water Control and Customs Clearance, cynically criticizing Lu Xun. Four days later, that is, 165438+ 10/8, she wrote "Talking with Mr. Hu Shizhi about the current cultural trends" (published in the first issue of Bentao of 1937). Su wrote in the preface of the article: "As far as Lu Xun's life is concerned, there will be no place for the biography of twenty-four scholars, and it is really difficult to find such villains. "From the late autumn of 1936 to the spring of 1937, Sue wrote several articles in succession and published them in Chengdu. 1949, after Su arrived in Taiwan, the two sides were in a hostile state, and Su's attitude towards Lu Xun can be imagined. Since 1950s, she has been writing articles to continue her anti-Lu cause, including My Views on Fighting Literature and Art, Lu Xun, Genius of Pipa and Abalone, Forty Years of New Literary World, and Biography of Lu Xun. 1967, most of her articles were collected and published on Lu Xun (Aimei Publishing House). When the book was published, Sue said, "I've been fighting with Lu for half my life, and I don't want to pay attention to it anymore. "..." On the eighteen articles collected by Mr. Lu Xun and the appendix * * *, she talked about the purpose of publishing this book in the Introduction. Why should I publish this collection at this time? First, people must know that Su is against Lu Xun. " Anti-Lu "has almost become my career for half my life, but why should I oppose it?" How is it illegal? No one seems to know clearly. ..... because this book represents my personal "observation", "feeling" and "evaluation" of Lu Xun. Second, this year 10 19 is the 30th anniversary of Lu Xun's death ... As an anti-Lu person, I should also write something, so I wrote a 27,000-word biography of Lu Xun in one breath, and I turned my admiration for Lu Xun into the reason for my opposition. Thirdly, I have seen that in recent years, "praising Lu" has gradually become a trend in the forums in Taiwan Province Province, and some people in Taiwan Province Province clamored for reprinting Lu Xun's works. But I'm worried that Lu Xun's idol will be erected again in Taiwan Province Province, and the worship of Lu Xun will become more and more popular in Taiwan Province Province. The language is clear, clear and unobtrusive. Sue is honest with readers, from which it is not difficult to see her "courage" and "courage".
On the "Criminal Evidence" of Lu Xun from Liang Shiqiu and Su.
Cai Hongwei feng Jing xing Hua Fang
When Lu Xun was alive, ordinary practitioners dared not confront him head-on. Liang Shiqiu, who has a degree in Tsinghua and studied in the United States, is above average, so he was lucky enough to walk with Lu Xun several times when he was alive. As a result, he was concerned, and 1964 was still a little uneasy when he wrote Lu Xun. Until Liang died, his evaluation of Lu Xun, who died before him, always maintained the attitude of the debate that day, and did not intensify his words. From this point of view, Liang is a gentleman.
Sue is different. When Lu Xun was alive, she seemed afraid of challenges, and she had no chance to accept them. After all, she is just an Anhui woman born in Li Ya, Ruian County, Wenzhou. When she was studying abroad, she tried to talk about irrelevant relationships. After returning to China, her marriage had some problems. Although he is a student of Hu Shi, he has a golden signboard, but after all, he is a little at a loss in society. Once Lu Xun is really exposed, the consequences are unimaginable! Therefore, Su's criticism of Lu Xun was almost always said after Lu Xun's death. Lu Xun couldn't hear it and was unable to fight back. So, let this Anhui woman "scenery" and "victory" die after her 100 years old. Compared with Liang Shiqiu, Sue is the real villain!
However, when Liang Shiqiu and Su criticized Lu Xun, they invariably cited a "criminal evidence", that is, Lu Xun's changeable working environment. In other words, they all agree that frequent job-hopping shows that Lu Xun has a personality problem and has a bad relationship with his colleagues. Liang Shiqiu only mentioned the defects of Lu Xun's character, thinking that he was extreme, emotional and easy to be used. The implication is that there is compassion. Sue attacked Lu Xun personally, saying that he had personality problems, so he was not accommodated by the surrounding environment.
Indeed, in Lu Xun's short life, he walked all the way, from Shaoxing to Nanjing, to Japan/Japan, to Hangzhou, to the north/Beijing, to Xiamen, to Guangzhou and to Shanghai. I have been to many units (including government agencies, universities, middle schools, etc. ), but also quarreled with many colleagues (including scholars like Gu Jiegang). If this can explain a person's character or personality problems, then the mountain people and the vegetarian squatters who stay in the same place will not become saints! Didn't Du Fu, who the Sioux lived on, become a "stray cat" with extremely suspicious personality? Du Fu's job-hopping experience is much worse than Lu Xun's!
What's more, Lu Xun's life has changed from eating public meals to being a self-employed, and he has written a great deal on the historical picture of China intellectuals' struggle for independent personality. Only when the economy is independent can there be freedom of speech. Lu Xun achieved this goal. Therefore, Liang Shiqiu and Su, who lived in the system, took this opportunity to laugh at Lu Xun for losing his job. This is actually the difference between "man" and "slave"!
Liang Shiqiu devoted himself to his duties, taught and educated people all his life, was diligent and studious, and made great achievements. His translation of Shakespeare's achievements and the editing project of Far East English-Chinese Dictionary can be regarded as a good "slave" within the system. Sue, on the other hand, is a bad slave at most! She concocted a lot of writing rubbish, which sometimes made her teacher Hu Shi feel stinking and he couldn't smell it. Hu once wrote to Sue, telling her not to "study" A Dream of Red Mansions! Because Sue's academic ability is too shallow and her utilitarian heart is too urgent. Once I looked through her introduction to Tang poetry, and I really couldn't stand it. I really don't understand how she educates other children!
This shows the value of Lu Xun, the respectability of Liang Shiqiu and the contemptibility of Su.
September 3, 2007 in Yongnan.
I wonder if this is it? It feels more like ...