In fact, this question can return to whether silicone prosthesis is better or autologous fat is better. First of all, we have to admit that autologous fat is more realistic, but after all, it is the way of autologous fat injection, and its absorption rate and survival rate are inevitable. According to personal circumstances, the survival rate of autologous fat is generally between 30% and 70%. However, in order to avoid fat accumulation and nodules caused by one overcharge, it usually takes 2-3 times to achieve the desired effect. However, it should be reminded that the plastic effect of injection method is not as good as that of eyebrow arch method.

Prosthetic rhinoplasty generally has two materials, silicone and swelling, which are widely used in eyebrow arch. Expansion is superior in modeling and carving, with good ductility and elasticity. It can fit the shape of eyebrow bone well, has good histocompatibility, is not easy to shift, and is also very easy to carve. However, people who seek beauty from silicone report that they feel heavy or oppressive after operation, which is easy to form capsule contracture, so the material of silicone is difficult to fit eyebrows perfectly.

It should be said that each has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the specific choice should be based on your own eyebrow arch.