To sue you, they don't have to notarize first. The key issue is evidence. First of all, it is not difficult to prove that they took the photos. The key is to ask the other party to prove your infringement. The fact that they should fix your website by some technical means and use their things can also be reproduced in court. I don't understand the technical problems.
If this kind of thing goes to court, you are sure to lose, so if they will prepare evidence, you should try to settle it with each other. If you really go to court, it is estimated that the compensation is not much. If the other party agrees, it is better not to go to court and waste energy and money. And being known by others will reduce the credibility of your store. ...
Decision of the Supreme People's Court on Amending the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in the Trial of Cases Involving Copyright Disputes in Computer Networks
(Adopted by the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court at its1302nd meeting on 23 February 2003)
The Decision of the Supreme People's Court on Amending the Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in the Trial of Computer Network Copyright Disputes was adopted by the the Supreme People's Court Judicial Committee at its1302nd meeting on February 23rd, 2003. Is hereby promulgated and shall come into force as of June 7, 2004.
February 2(nd), 2004
According to the provisions of the Copyright Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), which was reviewed and revised at the 24th session of the Ninth the NPC Standing Committee on October 27th, 2006, the the Supreme People's Court Judicial Committee decided at its1302nd meeting to make the following amendments to the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in the Trial of Computer Network Copyright Disputes:
First, delete the second paragraph of Article 2.
2. Article 3 is amended as: "Reproduction or abstraction of a work that has been published in a newspaper or spread on the Internet does not constitute infringement, except for the statement of the copyright owner or the statement of newspapers, periodical agencies and Internet service providers that the copyright owner is not allowed to reprint or abstract it, and remuneration shall be paid and the source shall be indicated in accordance with relevant regulations. However, if the reprinted or extracted works are beyond the scope of reprinting works in relevant newspapers and periodicals, they shall be deemed as infringement. "
3. One article is added as Article 7: "If a network service provider intentionally uploads, disseminates or provides methods, equipment or materials specially used to deliberately evade or destroy other people's copyright technical protection measures, the people's court shall investigate the civil tort liability of the network service provider according to the litigant's claims and specific cases and in accordance with the provisions of Item (6) of Article 47 of the Copyright Law."
4. Article 7 is renumbered as Article 8, and the second paragraph is amended as: "If the Internet service provider still fails to take measures after the copyright owner produces the above certificate, the copyright owner may apply to the people's court for an order to stop the relevant acts, preserve the property before litigation and preserve the evidence, or apply to the people's court for an order to stop the infringement, remove the obstruction and eliminate the influence."
Five, delete ninth.
Six, delete tenth.
In addition, the order of articles shall be adjusted accordingly according to this decision.
The Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in the Trial of Cases Involving Copyright Disputes in Computer Networks shall be revised accordingly and re-promulgated.