The second situation is the comparison of the production cars we use every day. Which is more fuel efficient, Camry 2.0 or 2.5? From the surface data alone, it seems that the 2.5 with larger displacement has higher fuel consumption; But the reality is, I think even if there are two Camrys with the same displacement, if ten people drive these two Camrys, I believe the data will definitely have different results. In other words, some people drive 2.0 to save fuel, while others drive 2.5 to save fuel. Both of these situations may happen, because there are too many factors that affect fuel consumption. Let's have a look.
There are too many factors that affect the fuel consumption of a car. The use environment, driving habits, driver's technical level and so on are all important factors affecting fuel consumption, but relative to the displacement, I think it is not the most important factor, and it should be said that it can only be ranked after the above factors. First of all, the use environment is mainly divided into urban road conditions and high-speed road conditions. Obviously, the fuel consumption of high-speed road conditions must be dominant. Even if the Camry of 2.5 is used up, the fuel consumption is not necessarily higher than the urban road conditions of 2.0. So the level of fuel consumption depends on what kind of use environment.
Secondly, the problem of driving habits, the same car, different drivers will have different fuel consumption, not to mention the Camry with 2.0 and 2.5 different displacement. Actually, it has a lot to do with the driver's driving experience. If an old driver drives a 2.5 Camry, it may be more fuel efficient than a novice driving a 2.0 Camry. Even if it is driven by ten people, there will be ten different results. So which of Camry's 2.0 and 2.5 fuel economy is judged by displacement alone? It is neither objective nor realistic. I always think that when the displacement is not much different, the displacement does not affect the final fuel consumption. Although the displacement of 2.0 looks small, if it is a small horse-drawn cart, sometimes the fuel consumption is not lower than 2.5.
To sum up, which is more fuel efficient, Camry 2.0 or 2.5? Judging from the magnitude of displacement alone, I think it has no practical significance and guiding role. Which displacement is more fuel efficient? I think it is better to learn and master the fuel-saving skills of cars and strive to improve their driving habits and technical experience. The above views are only personal. Welcome everyone to communicate, share and learn together. Thank you!
Camry is a popular model in the field of mid-level cars. It is divided into three power versions, namely 2.0L naturally aspirated version, 2.5L naturally aspirated version and hybrid version. So which power version should I buy? If the budget is sufficient, the Camry hybrid version is of course the most worthwhile, with excellent fuel economy and excellent dynamic responsiveness at medium and low speeds. However, if the budget is tight, how to choose version 2.0 and version 2.5?
Let's start with the conclusion. It is highly recommended that you choose the 2.0L version. Don't believe that there is not enough power, small horse-drawn carts and the like. Anyone who bought version 2.5 will regret it.
Dynamic contrast
First of all, look at motivation. Camry version 2.0L has a maximum horsepower of 178 horsepower, a peak torque of 2 10 Nm, and a speed range of 4400-5200 rpm. The 2.5L version of Camry has a maximum horsepower of 209 horsepower, a peak torque of 250 Nm and a speed of 5000 rpm. From the data point of view, the displacement is 0.5L more, the horsepower is 32 more and the torque is 40 Nm more. Camry version 2.5 is about 1 second faster, one is about 9.2 seconds, and the other is about 10.3 seconds.
However, we have to say "but", the matching of Aisin 8AT gearbox equipped with version 2.5 Camry is problematic, and there are stumbling problems at medium and low speeds. Whether it's an upshift or a downshift, as long as you start the car cold, you will step on the accelerator at low speed, and when you slide, the speed is about 30 per hour, which will have obvious mopping feeling. If this happens to your Camry, it means that you bought genuine products.
Camry's 2.0L version of CVT gearbox is much smoother. In most cases, there is no sense of frustration, and the smoothness of daily driving is better. In the case that many people in China never use floor oil when driving, its power is enough for more than 95% people. Many 1.5 self-priming cars and 1.6 self-priming cars running on the road will still be the first cars to rush out at traffic lights as long as you dare to step on the gas pedal. If you need power, please go out and turn left and choose Magotan 380 and Mai Rui Bao XL.
Fuel consumption comparison
Many people say that the fuel consumption of Camry version 2.0 is not necessarily lower, because small horse-drawn carts and small horse-drawn carts will only appear under high load. Under daily driving conditions, this 2.0L engine is enough to propel this car. According to the big data of bear's fuel consumption, the fuel consumption of the 2.0L version of Camry is 7.44 liters, and that of the 2.5 version of Camry is 8.3 liters. The difference is probably. There is no doubt that the 2.0 version of Camry is more fuel efficient, but not much. However, when driving in urban areas, the fuel consumption difference between the two cars will be higher.
cost comparison
Camry version 2.0 starting price 179800. The starting price of version 2.5 is 2 1.98 million yuan. If they are both luxury versions, the difference between them is 20 thousand yuan. There is not much difference in configuration between the two. Version 2.5 has panoramic sunroof and full LCD instrument. These two configurations are designed to increase the sense of grade, but they are not very practical configurations. For the difference of 20,000 yuan, you buy power that is one second faster than zero acceleration, and the price you pay is worse low-speed ride comfort. Everyone has his own opinion. Personally, I feel that this 20 thousand yuan is actually unnecessary. I can directly rule out the problem of low-speed frustration in version 2.5.
After all, people who buy Camry are comfortable and worry-free. People who care about power and zero-speed acceleration generally don't look at this car. In this case, I think version 2.0 is more worth buying. Its power is enough for 95% people in China. Its price is lower, the power is smoother, and it is very suitable for family cars.
First, there is little difference in engine technology between Toyota Camry 2.0 and 2.5 pure gasoline engines. After all, they are all produced by one manufacturer. In normal use, the actual fuel consumption performance is similar, and even the fuel consumption performance of large displacement is better than that of small displacement in many cases.
Second, the size of fuel consumption is often not completely determined by displacement, but often depends on vehicle speed. The fuel consumption of 3000 rpm to 2.0 for a long time is definitely greater than 1500 rpm to 2.5. Mainly depends on the specific usage scenarios.
Third, in fact, from the manufacturer's point of view, for a B-class car like Camry, the large-displacement car is not the main force, or the manufacturer does not want to be the main force because its low-displacement car has higher profits.
Fourth, so if the meaning of this question is to choose a car model by comparing fuel consumption, it is unnecessary. Camry is a good choice. It's enough to just look at the budget, and try to spend money on configuration, especially on security configuration. As for displacement, it is not so important.
Whether Camry 2.0L or 2.5L is more fuel-efficient depends on the specific working conditions. If it is cruising, simply put, it is easier to save fuel with small displacement. If it is mixed working conditions in the city, it is hard to say. It also depends on whether the engine speed can step on the high efficiency range of the engine every time. If it is because of small displacement and insufficient power, it is easy to step on the speed every time, and the efficiency of the engine with small displacement will be reduced.
Whether the engine saves fuel depends on how it works. If the engine runs in different speed intervals, the efficiency is different, the engine speed is too high, the efficiency is reduced, the speed is too low, and the efficiency is also low. Therefore, as long as it can run in the highest efficiency range, the best fuel economy can be obtained. Simply put, it is the speed range of daily driving, and keeping it within the best efficiency range is the most fuel-efficient way; Engine efficiency consists of the product of mechanical efficiency, combustion efficiency and thermal efficiency. Because the mechanical efficiency and combustion efficiency can be close to 100%, it is generally considered as unit 1, and the thermal efficiency is only about 40% at present, so you can get the highest efficiency of the engine as long as you keep the thermal efficiency running in the optimal speed range!
The meaning of a small horse-drawn cart
Toyota's 2.5L engine has a maximum thermal efficiency of about 2500 rpm, which is a little lower than this and a little higher than this, and the efficiency is not up, which means more fuel consumption; Generally speaking, the optimum thermal efficiency speed of naturally aspirated engine is around this speed; For example, a car has a small displacement, poor power and too much self-weight, so whenever it accelerates, as long as it wants to make the car run, the speed has to reach three or four thousand revolutions, which is far from the optimal efficiency speed, so the thermal efficiency is very low and the engine efficiency will be very low at this time, which will lead to very fuel consumption!
For engines with larger displacement, because of more power, it is often enough to gently pedal when accelerating. With a light pedal, you only increase the speed by more than 2000 revolutions, which falls into the high efficiency range, so the machine with large displacement will save more fuel at this time, but this is relative. Taking 5.7L as 2.0L is the total drag, but pulling the speed to 200Km, 5.7L may be it. The self-priming speed of 5.7L may be less than 3000 rpm, so it is more expensive to pull 200Km with a 2.0L machine at this time than with a large displacement.
Which is more fuel efficient, Toyota 2.0L or 2.5L?
As mentioned above, what is a small horse-drawn cart? In fact, only when the power is extremely low and the vehicle weight (load) is extremely high will the small horse-drawn cart appear. The 2.0L Camry has low power when driving in the city, but it is not difficult to cope with daily acceleration, unlike the self-priming version of the previous generation Regal 2.0L; The weight of the previous generation Regal 2.0L vehicle exceeded 1.70 tons, and the weight after full load was even more amazing. At that time, the machine parameters of 2.0L were not ideal, so as long as the rotational speed was increased, the rotational speed would be too high, resulting in the situation that 2.0L was more expensive than 2.4L, but this generation of Camry was not as heavy as before, 180Ps horsepower, 65438+. In other words, as long as there is no small horse-drawn cart phenomenon (the speed is often too high), small displacement is definitely more fuel-efficient than large displacement!
In short, Camry 2.0L is more fuel-efficient than 2.5L. Unless you take those complicated road conditions, such as climbing steep slopes continuously, it is easier for a large-displacement 2.5L to keep the speed in an efficient range, while this 2.0L is easier to step on the speed, because the power is originally low, so you need a high speed to release the power, and if the speed is too high, the efficiency will come down, so it will consume more fuel. However, the 2.0L Camry has sufficient power, and it can handle most road conditions in life above 2000 rpm, so it avoids the phenomenon of small horse-drawn carts and will not consume more fuel than the 2.5L Camry. The same is true for running high-speed cruises. 120Km cruising at a constant speed requires about 45kW of power, so 2.0L is still more fuel efficient than 2.5L; Maybe when driving at a constant speed of 160Km, 2.5L will save more fuel than 2.0L, but at this time we have exceeded the speed limit!
Consumers habitually consider fuel consumption when choosing a car. After all, it is directly related to the use cost. But from an objective point of view, there is no so-called authoritative data, because besides the powertrain and self-weight, drivers' driving habits, manned load, driving road conditions and other factors have great influence, and subjective and objective factors are not constant. At present, it is recognized that the most valuable reference is the average fuel consumption of car owners, and its significance lies in that it can include various driving habits, various fuel consumption calculation methods and various road conditions. The data samples come from a wide range of sources, without specific restrictions, and are close to the real use environment.
The maximum power of Camry 2.0L is 167 HP and 169 HP respectively, and the peak torque is 199 Nm and 20 1 Nm respectively. It is matched with a 6-speed automatic manual transmission, and the corresponding curb weight is1530-/.
Camry 2.5L (fuel version) has a maximum power of 209 HP and a peak torque of 250 Nm. The transmission system is matched with an 8-speed automatic manual transmission, and the corresponding curb weight is 1580- 1605kg. The average fuel consumption reported by the owner is 8.4L/ 100km( 198 average).
To sum up, the fuel consumption can only be said theoretically to a great extent. Theoretically, 2.5L is definitely higher than 2.0L, but the premise is that other influencing conditions are unified and relatively constant, and there are too many influencing factors. Try to treat them objectively for reference only.
Self-priming cars within 2.5, Buick Regal 2.4, Accord 2.4 and Camry 2.5, are all more fuel efficient than 2.0. I have been to these car clubs. Eight generations of Camry 2.5G luxury 8 oil elite about 10 oil, and 12 car, Shang Feng also has about 8 oil. I don't accept refutation, so I'm at eight now.
Feedback statistics show that among the 20 19 Camry models, the average fuel consumption of the 2.0L( 178 HP)+analog 10 speed CVT version is 7.53L, and the fuel consumption range is 6.55l ~ 8.50l (feedback from 86 car owners); The average fuel consumption of the 2.5L (209HP) +8AT gearbox version is 8.33L, and the fuel consumption range is 7. 18L ~ 9.48 l( 1702 owner feedback).
The fuel consumption values of the national six emission standard vehicles are slightly different, among which the fuel 2.5L is 7.35l-9.31l (feedback from 99 owners), and the hybrid version 2.5L is 4.73 l-5.83 l( 1 1 owner), with an average fuel consumption of 5.28L.
Let's take a brief look at the powertrains of these two cars. 2.0 The maximum power of the self-priming engine is 178 HP, and the peak torque is 2 10 Nm, matching the CVT gearbox. 2.5 The self-priming engine has a maximum power of 209 HP and a peak torque of 250 Nm, matching the 8AT gearbox. For this model with a curb weight of XX tons, there is no small horse-drawn cart in Chengdu, no matter which power it is.
Theoretically, if the driving conditions, driving habits, external environment and driving mode of the two powertrain models are the same, the 2.0 self-priming model with smaller displacement will definitely save more fuel.
In fact, although these two models have been tested, the mileage is not very long, and there is no strict fuel consumption performance of different powertrains. Let me refer to two data to compare the fuel consumption performance of the two models. One is the test data of No.38 Car Evaluation Center, and the other is the accumulated fuel consumption data of Bear.
The fuel consumption data of the 2.5 self-priming fuel version tested by the No.38 evaluation center is 7.3 liters/100 kilometers in the urban area and 6.3 liters/100 kilometers at high speed (no air conditioning is needed in winter).
The fuel consumption data of the 2.0 self-priming vehicle tested by the No.38 evaluation center is 7.6 liters/100 kilometers in the city and 5.2 liters/100 kilometers at high speed (air conditioning is turned on in summer).
(These two data can refer to each other, but they can't be directly compared, because whether the air conditioner works differently in summer and winter, the engine efficiency is different due to different ambient temperatures, and the road environment should be different. )
Bear's fuel consumption, the comprehensive fuel consumption of 20 19 modified 2.5G deluxe edition is 8.33L/ 100 km, and the sampling quantity is 2 12 users.
The comprehensive fuel consumption of 20 19 modified version 2.0 deluxe edition is 7.52L/ 100 km, and the sampling quantity is 2 17 users.
From the above two reference surfaces, I personally think that the 2.0 self-priming version with smaller displacement will save more fuel. Friends, do you have the owner of the eighth generation Camry? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to tell you the real fuel consumption data of your model. Click on a free attention to help you solve the doubts and puzzles in car selection and car purchase.
The quality and fuel consumption of a car are a matter of driving habits. Sail 0 1 ran away1sold for more than 70,000 kilometers. There is basically no problem. Once, the battery died, so I asked a worker to help me push it out. Another time, on the viaduct in Hangzhou, the gear lever fell off. It happened to be in third gear. All the way from the third gear to the 4s shop for maintenance. The fourth son said that I never brought the gear lever to be repaired. That's right. My friend's sail fuel consumption 12 is more than 9. In 2007, Excelle just went public for a few days, running 270,000 kilometers, and the average fuel consumption was between 7 and 8. They say it will exceed 10. This car has never come down on the road after running for so many kilometers, and there is basically no problem, except that the clutch was broken on the way back from Shanghai once, and it was simply repaired without the clutch. Just a few days ago, I brought a car, and the speed of 8 generations of 2.5,2000 turned to 130 yards. According to the instructions, the running-in period is 1000 km, which is only over 600 km at present. I ran three one-way expressways from Xiaoshan in Hangzhou to Fenghua in Ningbo, with a speed of 170-20= 150*3=450, almost 450 kilometers per hour.
This car doesn't have to worry about fuel consumption, and its economy is 2.5. Don't buy this car just because it protects the value, travels 2.0 and saves fuel. Camry 1.5 tons, I am a 2.4G model of 1 1. The central control is not normal, and the direction keeps squeaking. Leakage of antifreeze in water tank is a common problem. More than 90 thousand kilometers have been replaced, and now the hydraulic pressure is anti-abnormal. There are many sensors in this car, and it will cost a lot of money if one of them breaks down. Mind buying a low-priced Toyota, the car is just a means of transportation. Buy a high-end corolla.