Therefore, some people joked that the phenomenon of making up lessons that had not been solved for many years was finally solved by the epidemic. However, with the school opening and holidays, educational and training institutions will have opportunities. After all, it is also a regular business organization, and it is impossible to close down. This is also a big industry.
Then, the problem of making up lessons came.
It should be said that this market demand exists. Especially affected by the epidemic, some parents feel that their children have delayed a lot of studies and want to make up for it from the remedial market. Both educational and training institutions and in-service teachers have opportunities.
Although the phenomenon of make-up lessons is rectified every year, as well as the paid make-up lessons for in-service teachers, they have little effect and are difficult to cure. Because the biggest problem is that there is such a demand. Nowadays, parents attach too much importance to education and always want their children to make up more points. This may be a kind of psychological comfort and a great expectation.
However, a document recently issued by the Education Bureau of Jiangdu District of Yangzhou City entitled "Implementation Opinions on Governing In-service Teachers to Engage in Paid Tutoring" clearly defines the behavior of paid tutoring and encourages real-name reporting.
If it can really be put in place, it will be a heavy hammer.
Among them, the most interesting thing is to help relatives and children make up lessons. The document clearly stipulates that "helping relatives and friends' children to carry out free tutoring, but failing to declare the object and number of free tutoring to schools and district education bureaus, or the number of applicants is inconsistent with the actual situation, is regarded as paid tutoring."
That is to say, as an in-service teacher. First, you can make up lessons for relatives, friends and children free of charge, but you can't make up lessons with pay or charge; Second, even if it is to help relatives, friends and children make up lessons for free, they should be put on record in a unified way, and no more than five people are allowed.
Another rule is also quite powerful, that is, "encourage real-name reporting, verify the reward 1000 yuan and keep it confidential." It is also worth noting that "more than 0/0% of parents are randomly selected from various schools to organize discussion or telephone return visits, and more than 20% of students conduct questionnaires to find out whether teachers are engaged in paid tutoring."
Obviously, a comprehensive supervision system has been launched for paid tutoring of in-service teachers. There are not only reports, but also surveys for students or parents.
It can be said that it not only blocked the excuses of relatives, friends and children, but also adopted an all-round supervision system. In-service teachers are almost "doomed" to make up lessons with pay.
However, even if it is so severe, there are still loopholes to be drilled.
First, can the person subjected to execution be truly resolutely and fairly executed? This society still has human feelings. As an education department, can and dare to punish teachers who give money to tutor? Worth observing. After all, some teachers also have connections or backgrounds. If they meet a plea, can they still carry it out? If the implementation is selective, the seriousness of this provision will be greatly reduced. This difficulty should be estimated.
Second, it is not feasible to tutor relatives, friends and children. It is not difficult to report it. What is difficult is how to define paid and unpaid. Since we are relatives and friends, there are many ways to give money. Even if the money is really given, it is impossible to tell the outside world. What's more, a slightly smarter teacher will not be stupid enough to collect money directly by making up lessons. In short, there will be more ways to cope. After all, we are relatives and friends and spend too much time together.
The concept of friends is broader. As long as we know each other, we can be regarded as friends. If you don't know, you can know.
Third, should teachers have decent and legal income channels? The key to prohibiting paid tutoring for in-service teachers is that some teachers use their own teaching convenience. After all, students or parents want a teacher, even if it is voluntary, it may be voluntary. This is no good, obviously unhealthy, and should be strictly rectified.
However, an excellent teacher should be able to use his talents and rest time to earn a decent and legal income for himself. The path should be available. The key is to standardize and make good use of it, which can be regarded as giving play to their knowledge.
Unless their teaching salary is high enough, or they can earn high income by their own ability and diligence, rather than low salary, the desire to make up lessons with compensation may not be so strong. Otherwise, teachers' income is low, and they have to find other ways to increase their income.
Of course, what is more fundamental is the in-depth reform of the examination enrollment system, which no longer cares about scores. But it's too difficult for the time being. After all, it is relatively fair, and it may really be exams and scores. Otherwise, it is easy to be used by powerful people.