India's historical problems
India is located in Southeast Asia of China, and the whole country covers a piece of water in South Asia, so it is called? The largest country in South Asia? . Speaking of which? Maximum? Concept, you don't think this also covers the comprehensive strength, this? Big? It is a pure national territory.
Although in history, its identity, like that of China, belongs to? Four ancient civilizations? One, but because of the invasion of European powers, this country lost its sovereignty in the process of development. Without sovereignty, it means that development is blocked. After all, the powers that invaded India will never give them a chance to develop in order to continue to enslave this land.
/kloc-At the beginning of 0/7th century, that is, 1600, British warships left the European continent, where they had been persistent, and turned to distant India, where they cruelly exploited this ancient land. Strictly speaking, Britain's slavery to India actually began in the late 1950s, while India's independence began in the late 40s. This kind of slavery enslaved this country for nearly 200 years.
In the 1950s, with the support of Indian domestic forces and some British forces, Britain and India were founded, but they are still members of the Commonwealth. This shows that India has not shaken off the shadow of British rule after all.
India's military power
(1), personnel quality
With the subsequent development, India's comprehensive strength has indeed improved significantly. Some people attribute such achievements to their suzerain country, Britain, while others attribute such achievements to their continuous efforts. Anyway, the development of India is obvious to all. India has the second largest population in the world. Although it will bring them some bad effects, it will play a positive role on the other hand. For example, India has a vast population market, a large number of laborers and a steady stream of high-quality soldiers.
In the final analysis, whether an army is strong or not depends first on the quality of its personnel. Because it has a huge population base and India attaches great importance to the quality of individual soldiers, the quality of soldiers is not bad. After all, the huge population base gives India a choice.
② Structure scale
India's military structure is composed of regular army and irregular army (reserve), which is a relatively simple total command structure. In the regular army, it is also divided into three services: land, sea and air. According to statistics, India's current strength totals11450,000.
③ Weapons and equipment
Because of the importance attached to the rationing of military equipment, India's expenditure on equipment is unambiguous; In order to increase the combat effectiveness of the army, India is gestating? Keep improving? The spirit of buying weapons around the world is precisely because of India's move, so many people refer to the equipment of the Indian army as? Made in various countries? .
summary
To sum up, from a more objective point of view, whether it is the quality of soldiers, the establishment of troops, weapons and equipment, India's military strength has improved too much compared with the previous Indian army.
However, from the perspective of actual combat, there are still some loopholes and shortcomings in India's military system. For example, the members of the military establishment are chaotic, and the weapons and equipment are advanced but cannot be mastered.
But on the whole, although the Indian army is much worse than China, it is not vulnerable, so there is still strength.