First of all, the demand for subsidies is reasonable. If you want to subsidize my behavior of supporting the main body with both hands, and the subsidy of 50 a day is really too small, even renting equipment is not enough. But as a working adult, we can't do things without considering the consequences. It doesn't solve the problem to say that it shouldn't be lent out after the incident, so we should actually analyze what problems may arise after asking for subsidies and think about solutions. There are many cases in which the company requires employees to lend personal belongings, so the current situation is that the company is dissatisfied with the general employee allowance as wages, and wants to take the photographer allowance as wages, and comes to Zhihu to ask whether it is necessary to bargain, so we will focus on analyzing the consequences of bargaining. If the foundation is not solid, then the question becomes whether to bear the loss in exchange for not being left a negative impression by anyone, thus affecting the company's position and future. If you choose to fight for your own rights and interests, you can explain the rationality of your appeal from many angles. For example, the camera is not mine. I borrowed it out of human feelings or money. I helped the company out of kindness, but the subsidy was not enough for my own expenses. I should take the corresponding salary instead of the photographer. So I think I should fight for higher compensation. If the subject is likely to be persuaded to give up the struggle after fighting for rights and interests, it is suggested to ignore this argument. The company's behavior is really bad. It is suggested that no matter how you choose, you should leave a lesson, discuss the remuneration in advance in the future, try not to make oral transactions with company groups, and don't talk about remuneration afterwards.