As for 73, it is a product that needs to be recalled in my eyes.
1, MDH 1 full HD 1920, wide angle is average, white balance is ok, anti-shake is the same as 1500C, and you can easily throw 73 pieces. Except for the poor appearance, other aspects are worthy of the price of 6/7000.
2, 1500c, wide angle is very good, which is equivalent to 18 lens of APS SLR (except Quan Huafu), and it is far from its brother 1500C, which proves that Sony's upgrade is sincere. In contrast, Panasonic rose from MD 10000 to 73. Sony's white balance is not blowing. If you use 73, you will feel that "memory" is reasonable.
3. Say 73 again, 1440. Not full HD. 3CCD didn't find any advantages, but it consumed too much power. There is no anti-shake function (in my eyes, its anti-shake function is simply shaking), and the wide angle is the same as Sony 1000C, which looks very anxious. White balance is really weak. And the manual ability, alas, is the worst manual operation I have ever seen.
Of course, 73 is not completely without advantages, that is, 37MM (real shot lens diameter, non-filter 43) Lycra lens, the imaging quality is really good. But not an enthusiast, basically can't see much difference. Just like shooting it with a few thousand yuan machine now, you can't tell high from low.
If you want to compare 73 with 1500C, you can only use the tripod in the telephoto state (the lens of 73 is good, and the contrast advantage is more obvious under telephoto, and the tripod can avoid the bad anti-shake of 73).
In short, you have money to buy 1500C, but no money to play MDH 1. Don't treat MDH 1 badly, it's definitely worth it.
In addition, I would like to ask the landlord why 73 is a good machine. Who said that? People who talk like others kill people. Those people only looked at the parameters and said yes, but didn't even look at what the machine looked like. Those who bought 73 swallowed their teeth and insisted on saying yes. I really don't know what is good.