See the authoritative explanation.

Which is better to answer first? The second one is better than the first one. Let's do an analysis.

Let's talk about cutting before analyzing, and look at the color and clarity given by your two diamonds. The first diamond should be the certificate of national inspection, and the second diamond is GIA's, so let's cut it. If the cutting level is in China, it can be divided into good and average, while in GIA, it can be divided into standard round diamond princess oval according to the type of cutting, but there are no Belgian cutting and eight hearts and eight arrows cutting. Belgian cutting corresponds to China cutting, Indian cutting and American cutting, and it is said that the cutting technology in each region is different and has a wide range. For example, India's cutting is rough, and small diamonds are cut more. But we can't simply say a diamond, which is more misleading. There is no appraisal agency H & eight hearts and eight arrows appraisal. For H&; A is not what people say, but the appraiser asked GIA to put other words on the diamond, which requires an extra $65,438 +05, and then H &；; A, I hope cutting can help you.

The e color of the second diamond is better than that of the first diamond. Although the second diamond is VS 1, their appraisal institutions are different and their evaluation criteria are different. If the first diamond is identified by GIA, it is likely to be identified as vs 1. For the sake of clarity, the world is unified, but the upper and lower limits are different. No matter which one it is, the color will not be three levels worse.

Finally, talk about your diamond quotation. I did the math for you. If the second single rough stone is about 4,200, plus about 2 grams of 18kk gold, 200 grams is 400, and the processing fee is 50. A * * 4650 is 350 more expensive than my quotation. Considering this business comprehensively, it is still possible, and you can consider buying it.