There are not all kinds of gangsters in society, but more and more, just because the crackdown is not severe and the warning is not enough. I don't know why someone came up and said that three children were wronged. What is your basis? Did the 70-year-old man fabricate a filthy story out of nothing to defile himself and frame three teenagers? Or * * lynching deliberately framed? He was acquitted for lack of evidence. We should know that suspicion never exists just to protect good people from being wronged. It is only for this reason that some criminals can escape and exploit the loopholes of the law. There are many criminal facts, but no evidence can be found. Aren't there many unsolved cases that can't be solved? This is not what we want to see! * * There is indeed dereliction of duty, that is, the evidence is not locked in time, so that the criminals who raped the 70-year-old man can not be severely punished by law, and they are at large, and the grievances of the 70-year-old man have nowhere to sue! Of course, a normal good boy wouldn't do such a nasty and heinous thing. But just because things are so obscene and outrageous doesn't mean they didn't do it. Don't be naive. If people were like what we imagined, there would be no crime and no prison. But is this the case? It is difficult for us to tolerate that the grievances of the elderly have nowhere to sue, it is difficult to tolerate that criminals are at large, and it is even more difficult to tolerate that criminals receive state compensation. Isn't that encouraging crime, advocating hooliganism after committing a crime, and refusing to plead guilty? No wonder there are more and more hooligans. That's how they are encouraged. Do we want the rule of law or not? The rule of law means that good people are protected and bad people are severely punished.