By the way, that Land Rover owner is the publisher of false information.

The following is the original answer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Land Rover Owner: Female.

Bmw owner: male.

BMW occupied the parking space of Land Rover, and Land Rover ignored BMW at the beginning of house decoration.

BMW, on the other hand, has occupied the parking space of Land Rover for a long time.

Land Rover got angry and blocked the BMW in its parking space.

Land Rover bought a Tibetan mastiff to look after the garage.

He was poisoned in a few days. A discerning person can tell at a glance that BMW did it. But there is no evidence.

After the BMW was blocked, it began to play around and look for a forklift.

Land Rover put a vase worth 654.38+0.45 million in the car and bought a new Range Rover. I plan to park another car in my garage for a long time.

BMW is waiting for the mouse, and now they are in a lawsuit.

This is very interesting. Obviously, the financial resources of BMW owners are not as good as those of Land Rover owners. Land Rover owners specifically proposed a new car to block BMW, and also put a vase of 1.45 million on the car. If BMW owners have strong financial resources, they can also buy a new car. Of course, a BMW driver and a Land Rover driver are richer than me.

If you can evaluate right or wrong, it must be the fault of the BMW owner. How can you be so loyal when you occupy someone else's garage?

Land Rover owners, I personally think. . . No problem. First I put up with you taking your own garage, then I bought a dog and you poisoned it, and finally I moved my car with a forklift? Is it too much?

Things have developed to this point, and it is obvious that Land Rover owners are not short of money. To solve this problem, it is by no means a question of money. At least one or two million can't do it. An apology may solve the problem, but it is estimated that this apology must be Han Xin's level of humiliation!

If I am a BMW owner, I don't want a car. I'm not going to solve this either. Come on, if you touch my car, I will sue you. Land Rover owners can't take you, provided that you are willing to give up this car.

If I am a Land Rover owner, if the other party really gives up this car, I have no countermeasures. Instead of stalemate and mutual loss, it is better to seek a solution that is satisfactory to both sides.

The result of both losses is certain. Land Rover owners have a lot of money, and the newly bought Range Rover is also an extra expense of this incident. If BMW owners want to solve this problem, they must compensate Land Rover owners for the loss of buying new cars, otherwise there is no possibility of negotiation.

Having said that, hehe, it's really a big mud. How to solve it depends on how the judge decides. But like this kind of muddled account, the judge estimates that it must be forced. It is obvious who is right and who is wrong, but we must solve this problem. . . Difficult! ! !