Although the woman came forward to respond to this matter, netizens did not understand her statement and refused to get married just because the underwear was not suitable. This really shouldn't be a reason. According to the woman's mother, because the underwear that the man bought for his daughter is too small, it may only be the size worn by junior high school students, which means that the mother-in-law can't tolerate her daughter. She refused to get married for fear of her daughter getting married. If you don't buy underwear, it means that the other party can't tolerate it? This is a bit too superstitious. Although many places have local wedding characteristics, there is no need to be so serious.
Therefore, I think that in this matter, the woman should bear a large part of the responsibility, and at the beginning, the woman did not intend to refund the bride price and other expenses given to her by the man, so the man planned to take up legal weapons to protect himself. You know, in this incident, the man is the real victim. The original wedding banquet has become a family dinner, so who should bear the cost of the wedding banquet? Although many relatives also expressed their understanding, they suffered losses for no reason, so this expense should also be borne by the woman.
It is a bit unreasonable for parents to give their daughters happiness just because of a pair of underwear. However, many netizens believe that it is reasonable for the man not to marry such a girl home, otherwise there will be no such father-in-law in the future. In any case, we should still believe in the law and hope that the man can get the compensation he deserves.