To compare the performance of two machines, it is generally necessary to comprehensively evaluate the lens, photoelectric conversion device and recording format.
See:/2046windows/blog/item/295e0d7fddba010329388a4d.html.
1, in terms of recording format:
1000E HD, 1080i HD.
198 is the standard definition with a resolution of 720*576.
Of course, the definition of 1080i is better. From this point of view, 1000E has advantages.
2, from the photoelectric conversion device:
198 is better than 1000E. Generally speaking, 198 can be used to get closer to the contrast of film.
3. From the lens:
They are all 20x zoom heads, but 198 has an independent aperture ring, which is more convenient to manually adjust the aperture than 1000E. The lens quality of 198 is also higher.
So looking at the problem comprehensively, 198 is more suitable if it is shooting news, special topics and other TV programs.
Creative shooting, such as independent films or documentaries, each has 50% advantages.
If it is a wedding or a company program, 1000E is more suitable for the simple reason that the advantages of 198 will be lost in non-creative and documentary shooting. The advantages of 1000E are revealed. The picture definition is high, and the "HD" machine is recognized by everyone.
About the parameters of these two machines:
/2046 windows/blog/item/f 4278 e 0 FB 5d 6 DDE 7 ab 6457 a 4 . html
/2046 windows/blog/item/3 fabbddd 37 1 fa 53 f 5982 DD 8 b . html