Each has its own advantages. Japanese cars have three advantages: fuel economy, no minor faults and durability. Accord, Camry and Nissan are all large-space, high-capacity cars and fuel-efficient. Honda Accord is technically more mature, with the largest space, better ride comfort and the best power among the three. It's really not built to rank first every year. The most prominent feature of Toyota Camry is fuel economy, which is more fuel efficient than Accord, but the power is average and the gearbox is average. The ride comfort is similar to that of the Accord, but the space is smaller than that of the Accord. Nissan Teana's nasal sound is good, quiet and durable. I have used pickups and carts for so many years and have rich experience. Compared with the first two cars, the rest have shortcomings, and the interior is also the most tacky of the three cars. Also, I have seen the front bumpers of Avant-garde and Tiida open, which are basically foam, and I have never seen anti-collision steel. . . This is also a common problem of Japanese cars. The main body is welded, not molded at one time. The anti-collision steel beam is thin in the front and not thin in the back, and then all configurations and technologies can be the lowest, and the unused ones will not be used. So I am often scolded. . . . But then again, if you fly like a plane and give you a tank, you will die, too. . . Mazda 6 belongs to a sports neutral car, that is, the role of semi-car and semi-running. Although there is no bright spot in technology, it has the advantages and disadvantages of Japanese cars. The main advantage of Ma 6 lies in its attractive appearance and interior, which is suitable for young people. . .

As for the Regal of GM Buick, its appearance is fierce, tough and atmospheric. The car is solid, rigid, good in front and rear collision avoidance, rich in configuration and full of power. But the fuel consumption is high, and there are some minor problems, such as abnormal brakes and easy carbon deposition in the engine. The space is also smaller than that of Japanese cars, and it is uncomfortable to ride in the back.

I personally wouldn't consider buying a Korean car. Cheng Jing is a Korean car, and Cheng Jing's predecessor is Baron Daewoo. After Chevrolet acquired Daewoo, the parts were also OEM in Korea, basically with a new shell and a new logo. The most direct idea is, if it sells well, does it need to be acquired? I don't see those big factories being acquired? Of course, these commercial activities are beyond our understanding. What can I say about Korean cars? The advantage is that they are dynamic in appearance. They are all designed by well-known European designers and have won the best appearance award of the year for many times. The interior is full of technology. When you get into the car, it's like driving a spaceship, and it's safe and functional. Whether you use it or not, I'll give it to you first But it's not so beautiful when you really get on the bus and drive. The advantages of Japanese and American cars have not been learned, but the disadvantages are complete: high fuel consumption, insufficient body rigidity, thin anti-collision beam, many minor faults, poor chassis adjustment, loud engine noise, and so on. I think if Hyundai (Kia is acquired by Hyundai) can save those configurations that are not used once every 10,000 years, it is better to develop more advanced technologies. I personally don't recommend buying a Korean car.

Having said that, the most important thing is the direction of your car. If you drive to and from work, receive customers and travel occasionally, Japanese cars are the best choice. Personally, I strongly recommend the Accord. If you often run at high speed and want to passively defend better cars, then you can choose Regal or Volkswagen Passat and Magotan. Personally recommend magotan. Actually, driving. You can drive any car smoothly. If you want to drive fast, I suggest that you have time to play simulation games.