Many people don't read the micro-orders posted by someone. It must be a micro-single, micro-single! Having said that, however, after my summary, in fact, the most important thing of micro-single is to strengthen the camera function. The first is eye control focusing. Canon EOS R's various magical black technologies on the micro-single are not far behind. Are you afraid to call yourself a micro-single without eye control?
In fact, the gap between the two cameras seems to me to be high sensitivity, bayonet and tolerance. Some people say that EOS R does not prevent 5D4. In my opinion, this is the non-reverse version of 5D5, upgraded under the template of 5D4, and there are some shadows of 5D4! Speaking of which, I think EOS R is still worth buying. After all, the trend of micro-single is obvious now, so I need to doubt whether there is a 5D5 model.
On the whole, Canon's bayonet adapter is also considered for SLR. Friends who used to have SLR can try it. After all, it is not so comprehensive without a mirror. There is nothing wrong with buying EOS R!
I have Canon EOSR and 5D4 cameras. In comparison, EOSR and 5D4 are almost the same. From the parameter configuration, it can be said that EOSR is a reduced version of 5D4, and at the same time, it enhances the focusing ability of EOSR, mainly by upgrading the design of eye-controlled focusing and micro-single body. The correct name of eye control focusing should be eye focus.
These two products have their own advantages, similarities and differences. Let's talk about the difference first. EOSR is Canon's first Quan Huafu micro-single. From the design point of view, it is not perfect, and there are some defects. For example, the flip screen on the back is no different from the 80D and 6D2, and looks very cheap. There is a big gap at the edge of the flip screen, which is not exquisite enough. The design and workmanship are not as good as those of Sony and Nikon A7M3 and Z6.
EOSR's CMOS has a protective cover, which can effectively protect CMOS from dust when changing lenses. The layout of the buttons has also changed, and there is a multi-functional touch bar. Personally, I think this function is very helpful, and it is easy to touch it by mistake if it is not easy to use.
Like 5D4, the battery can be used universally, and all batteries in 5D6D series can be used, and the parameter configuration is similar. Personally, I prefer the 5D4 of the two cameras. The actual use and control of 5D4 is much better than EOSR, but it is also better than 5D4. The final conclusion is that photographers use 5D4 and non-photographers use EOSR.
It should be well understood that 5D4 is a 20 16 product currently on sale by Canon in the digital age.
EOSR is a micro-camera introduced by Canon 20 18. Basically, it is the first digital camera that cloned some advantages of 5D4 and entered the micro-camera.
For the choice between the two, I personally think EOSR is not suitable for purchase at present, for the following reasons.
1, the first generation of equipment has many design deficiencies. Although it was released after 5D4, there are still many minor problems.
2. The future of RF card port must be very advantageous, but that is the future. No one knows what the future will be like. After all, the micro-single field is not contested by Canon, Sony, Nikon and Panasonic. Who will win is uncertain.
3. The picture quality is not far from 5D4, because he still uses the 5D4 sensor released by 20 16, but the processor is replaced by the latest one.
4.RF lens is very expensive, compared with EF lens, there are fewer choices and low cost performance.
5. EOSR that SLR can do can do it, and EOSR that SLR can't do it can't.
6.EOSR claims that more than 5,000 focuses are actually word games, and the actual number is 144.
7, 5D4 cost-effective, mainly related to various supporting facilities, and mature, I will choose SLR.
Summary: Although EOSR is Canon's latest micro camera, it still has some shortcomings. Canon also spent a lot of money on this micro-single-camera, and the slogan was changed to "shake your heart", but I think it is similar to "blow your heart", because the performance is not far from 5D4, just a doll micro-camera, and the lens investment is more than SLR, but it is undeniable that micro-single camera must be the future, and SLR is just the end of the world, although it is coming to an end.
EOS R and 5D4 are both full-frame cameras, the former is a non-inverting micro-camera, and the latter is a traditional SLR. How to choose depends on the main purpose and the lens in your hand.
There are many similarities between the two machines. The most important aspect is that cmos is basically the same piece, and there is no essential difference in image quality, so some friends will be a little confused when choosing. How should I choose a machine that looks similar?
First of all, if you want to buy something for work, you should choose a SLR 5D4.
Buying a camera needs to look at the whole system, not just the performance of the fuselage. The SLR camera system is now very mature, and the technology has developed to the stage of optimization in history. It is difficult to make any substantial breakthrough, and the control mode is already very fixed, because after years of evolution, it is almost perfect; The phase focusing system has reached a high level in speed and accuracy. The lens system is extremely rich and huge, which can meet all kinds of photography needs; Endurance has innate advantages; The compatibility of supporting facilities is excellent, and the domestic lamps and lenses of the deputy factory are very rich. Work with SLR cameras, such as ecological photography, commercial photography, product photography, wedding documentary photography, etc. Is a very reliable tool. Although mirrorless cameras has also developed very rapidly, there is still a certain gap compared with the maturity of SLR. At least it is a little slow in the reaction speed of the fuselage. Although it is close to the experience of SLR, it still has some shortcomings in stability. Occasionally, traffic jams will make professional photographers head. In addition, in terms of lens, although we can switch to the same brand SLR lens, the performance matching is still not as perfect as the original lens. If the purpose of buying a camera is to use it for office work and use it immediately, rather than for home or study, then SLR is undoubtedly the most reliable choice. Between 5D4 and EOS R, 5D4 is the most rational choice.
Secondly, if you have a large number of high-end EF lenses, you can continue to choose SLR 5D4.
The native bayonet and the native lens are the perfect combination and can play the best performance role. The lens of EF bayonet is matched with the SLR camera of EF bayonet, and this combination will definitely be more suitable than the non-inverted fuselage with RF card port and the matching EF lens with adapter ring. Some friends said that this is not necessarily the case. When the EF lens is switched to EOS R, many out-of-focus lenses will not run. That's true, because EOS R's full-pixel dual-core autofocus and 5D4' s optical phase focusing are different in principle, and the probability of defocusing will be very low, but in comparison, phase focusing is better than EOS R's generation in speed and focus tracking. At the same time, 5D4 also has a full-pixel dual-core focusing system, and switching to live view mode can still achieve high-precision focusing. Therefore, if there are many high-end EF lenses on hand, they will not all be sold in the short term. It will be more appropriate to use 5D4 SLR honestly. It doesn't matter if you don't have any high-end lenses at hand. Facing the future, RF lens will definitely have more development potential than EF lens in terms of optical quality, aperture and focusing. If you like to try new things, choosing EOS R and RF native lens will definitely have a better photographic experience.
Third, EOS R is more suitable for home use and beginners.
Home photography uses For cameras, image quality and ease of use are more important. At this point, EOS R has an advantage over SLR. Evf viewfinder and screen are WYSIWYG, which is very convenient for novices and home users. Touch screen control is similar to daily mobile phone usage habits, and its ease of use is higher than that of SLR; The flip screen is suitable for various viewing angles and does not depend on the optical viewfinder, so the shooting posture is more comfortable; The endurance is slightly weak, but it is completely enough for home use; The lens quality is higher than that of SLR, and the focusing success rate is also higher; The volume and weight are slightly smaller than that of SLR, and the RF lens also has a miniaturized lens, which is more portable than 5D4. From this point of view, EOS R is more suitable.
The above questions about the selection of EOS R and 5D4 are all Juan Taro's personal opinions and are for reference only.
In a sense, Canon EOS R is a non-reverse version of Canon 5d4, which can be seen from their use of the same sensor with more than 30 million pixels and their ability to take photos and videos.
So in my opinion, factors other than the quality of the camera itself are the factors that determine which camera you buy, and each one has its own advantages and disadvantages. On the whole, unless you are a professional commercial photographer, I recommend buying Canon 5d4. Now eos r is basically recommended. After all, EOS R with the same image quality is almost one third cheaper.
In addition, eos r can use Canon's ef and ef-s lenses except ef-m bayonet, while Canon 5d4 SLR camera can't use the latest RF card port, which is also a big advantage.
In addition, WYSIWYG without reflection makes focusing and exposure easier. Compared with the traditional optical viewfinder, it is more difficult for beginners to get started. In addition, the newly added eye focus is another weapon for portrait shooting.
Toothpaste factory deliberately makes EOSR function worse than 5D4, so you can understand EOSR as castrated version 5D4.
Comparison between Canon eos r and 5D4?
Canon eosr r is actually better than 5d4 in still portrait shooting, which can focus on the eyes and is quite comfortable to control. But if it is only static, there is basically no difference between 5D4 and EOS R. The only difference is that the lens is different. Eos r for tourism is still a very good choice.
If it is mainly snapshot, frequent snapshot and high-speed movement, then 5D4 is better. Eos r is currently unable to focus. The optical viewfinder of 5d4 has much stronger focusing and tracking ability.
If static shooting is the main method, the performance of the two cameras is similar. If there is any difference, it is that the lens is different and EOS r lens is less. If you mainly shoot sports, news and other high-speed sports moments, I still recommend 5d4, which has better operation resistance and focus tracking ability.
There is not much difference in basic imaging. EOSR is very light, which fills the blank of Canon Quan Huafu micro-single. 5D4 is very good. You should have everything to take pictures of, 4K video or time-lapse photography. If you don't mind 5D4, you can consider it, but it feels better than EOSR. After all, the 5d4 lens group is huge, and EOSR lenses are still relatively few for the time being.
Single-lens reflex and micro-lens are two lens systems. The fuselage can only be used for three years, but the lens can be used for 10 years. The development prospect is eos r, and the economic prospect is 5d4.