Each has its own advantages, and the advantage of mobile phone is the disadvantage of SLR. The advantage of SLR is also the disadvantage of mobile phone.

Whether a photo looks good or not is often a subjective judgment. It is normal that some people say yes and some people say no to the same photo. For people without art training, the photos of the Great Wall, folk customs and street sweeping taken by photographers are likely to be considered inferior to sugar water tablets.

Photos are a form of artistic expression, which can't be judged only by superficial phenomena, but also by connotation.

Moreover, it seems that there is no professional SLR for mobile phone photography function now. In fact, the effect of mobile phone photography is no better than that of single contrast. Even the photos taken by some newly listed camera phones and those taken by SLR can't tell which one was taken by mobile phone and which one was taken by SLR. How amazing you say!

Therefore, it is normal for professional cameras to beat SLR when the shooting function of mobile phones is not very inferior. The key point is that the key factor that determines the quality of a photo is not the photographic equipment.

I think it's a good sharing. Give me a compliment. Friends who like photography can pay attention to photography and intermediate classes. Besides pressing the shutter, there are still many processes to be completed in photography. Even the photos taken under the automatic function of professional cameras are only suitable for the camera's own LCD screen. Unless you have been holding a camera to show people what you have taken. Otherwise, you have to make the brightness contrast and color saturation of the photo suitable for viewing on a neutral display screen through post-processing. However, it will be messy on the cheap display or mobile phone screen that many people want to improve the contrast saturation.

Finally, photography depends not on professional cameras, but on professional technology and artistic accomplishment.

This is a fact. It is true that 90% of mobile phones are far better than professional cameras, especially for big scenes and landscapes. Impossible, because your professional camera is just fighting alone! Intelligent retouching with dual-camera AI with mobile phone can't beat it at all! Just like the chess master lost to the alpha dog, what about the top players in the world? Also lost to AI.

What should I do? The easiest way is to give up the camera and switch to the mobile phone shooting team! What mobile phone doesn't have a lens group like a professional camera? Who said that? I'm afraid you have no money to go to Taobao. There are also various mobile phone conversion lenses, even high-end Leica lenses! Open the mobile phone door quickly, and the Apple mobile phone will produce award-winning blockbusters and videos! Another way, put into practice, professional cameras can be set before and after shooting, and the effect will be leveraged! Or change to Fuji, and the camera has set the film flavor and German flavor for you, and it will come out in one shot!

Don't turn the door until you give up the pit-dropping equipment you own. Then you need to take good photos, study hard in your later period and improve your shooting level. What a professional camera can provide, a mobile phone can never give, but you don't even need these functions of a professional camera! Who are those? The adjustable aperture mobile phone is gone, and the optical zoom mobile phone is also badly damaged. Shutter setting is actually a fake setting. Do you know anything about these professional cameras? And can you use it flexibly to shoot the effect? If you can't even win the phone, then you really need to change your phone. Don't waste money!

Useful scholars don't care about pens, equipment is just a tool. You need to carefully understand the advantages of the tools in your hand and use them correctly, which will definitely play the greatest role! No shortage of tools, no shortage of brains behind the lens!

I'll send some pictures to see if they were taken by mobile phones. Are those taken with a camera?

In the later period, it is undoubtedly more possible to take photos with a camera than with a mobile phone, and taking photos with a mobile phone also has an incomparable advantage over a camera-you don't have to retouch the picture yourself.

The advantage of mobile phone, and the reason why you think mobile phone shooting is good, is that shooting is very convenient, and the optimization of "processor closes its eyes and guesses" is very suitable for consumers. You must admit this. After all, not everyone is good at mobile phone retouching, and what mobile phones can do automatically is naturally enjoyable. Moreover, ordinary consumers retouch their own pictures, which may not be as good as automatic retouching by mobile phones. So there will be this illusion: cameras are not as good as mobile phones.

But is it necessarily good for mobile phones to automatically retouch pictures? Of course not. The effect is not good after the mobile phone is shot. If you don't believe me, I can put some photos of manual repair below. After reading it, think about whether the mobile phone can generate this manual adjustment style with one click. After reading the following nine pictures, you should be able to understand that most of the photos were taken in three or four minutes, and the latter six or seven minutes. In fact, I want to say that mobile phone photo+automatic retouching is not particularly beautiful.

On the other hand, many people say that cameras are just like that, and many times they are not as good as mobile phones. It seems reasonable to have the above basis as support. But what I want to say is that it is much better for a camera to record photo information than for a mobile phone, especially for pictures in RAW format. This means that the photos of the camera are more adjustable in the later stage, and the photos coming out in the later stage are much stronger than those of the mobile phone.

Someone told you that the camera is not as beautiful as the mobile phone. What should I do? If someone tells you that the camera is not as beautiful as the mobile phone, admit the advantages of the mobile phone, and then tell him that "the mobile phone will automatically retouch the picture after shooting", but the camera is far better than the mobile phone in post-adjustment. The camera also has a rich focal length in the early stage, which can meet the needs of different subjects.

Oh?

It should be clearly pointed out that these pictures are all taken with medium and long focal length lenses, and the general mobile phone lens does not have this function; It must be bullying mobile phone shooting. It's so obscene, I just want to compare and recognize it, and then I won't talk about some topics that others don't want to correct. I am a compassionate person, and I am willing to accept the results of all criticism and pretend that I am a big-tailed wolf.

As for the following photos, they are all taken casually, definitely not works, exactly the same as those taken casually by mobile phones. Beauty doesn't matter. Let's laugh from the beginning, everyone can talk.

Friends who think that mobile phone shooting is better than camera shooting, send more photos taken by mobile phones! Waiting for a postcard-style large picture to appear.

Some people say that professional cameras are not as good as mobile phones. What should I do?

A: My answer is as follows:

(1) The so-called professional camera is a very uncertain concept. Broadly speaking, if it is used in business, it is also a professional camera. The photo booths in general tourist areas use half a Canon camera, and private small photo studios also use half a Canon camera. Some people accept wedding services and use worn-out half-size cameras. Fortunately, for SLR cameras, people who generally don't know photography can't see the grade, but I think a Hasselblad camera with hundreds of thousands is also a professional camera.

(3) Some ordinary photographers' cognition of photographic equipment has gone through several stages:

1. When digital cameras have become popular, I am still obsessed with film machines. I used to know a worker artist who was blocked by an association, that's all.

2. People who have been in the mirrorless camera for a long time before agreeing.

In some respects, mobile phone photography has surpassed the camera in some effects and functions, and it cannot be changed. A person who arbitrarily thinks it is impossible.

* * * Note that I am talking about ordinary photographers.

(d) For ordinary photographers, the photos taken by cameras are really not as beautiful as those taken by mobile phones under certain conditions.

Therefore, "some people say that professional cameras are not as good as mobile phones." This is not what a few people say. This is also a fact. If you don't do post-production, the photos taken with a camera at the same time are not as good as those taken with a mobile phone.

Again, I mean ordinary mobile phone users and ordinary photographers.

The question is so funny, hehe. What shall we do? Throw the camera into the river! Beat him up. I'm kidding.

In fact, the person who said this seems to be right or wrong, and the standard for taking pictures of cameras and mobile phones (according to Fan Wei) is a bit messy. Why do you say that? First of all, although these two machines can take photos, the purposes and requirements of the photos taken are different.

The advantage of taking photos by mobile phone is plug and play, and the results are produced after shooting, and uploaded immediately, which is immediate. Photos are viewed online and on mobile phones, and the requirements for photos are not high.

The disadvantage is that the camera function will collapse under special circumstances, such as poor light, night and distant view, and the photos can't meet the requirements at all.

The camera is different. The disadvantage of mobile phone is the advantage of camera. Because of the different image processors, mobile phones have great differences in color, saturation, overall layering, fineness and detail expression of photos.

Simply put, this is the difference between fast food restaurants and restaurants. What restaurants can cook, fast food restaurants can't, fast food restaurants can't, restaurants can, and they are delicious.

A scholar meets a soldier, which makes sense. Don't pay too much attention to what people who don't know the camera say. You really can't change his understanding, each has his own fun!

I am a photographer for a living, and occasionally take photos with my mobile phone. Of course, taking photos with mobile phones also has its advantages, such as being light and easy to shoot. Many masters have taken many interesting works with their mobile phones. However, some mobile phones boast super SLR, and the result sample is taken by SLR; Some mobile phone factories invite famous directors to shoot movies with their mobile phones for publicity, but the professional lens added in front of the mobile phones is enough to buy dozens of mobile phones, not to mention arranging professional teams for lighting, sound and post-production. Teacher Degang Guo is not my favorite comic dialogue actor, but he has a sentence that I appreciate: Why don't amateurs challenge professionals in boxing Sanda? Because it makes me feel bad. Everything should respect the profession. Can a three-year-old urchin play professional sumo wrestlers? No Similarly, no matter how good the algorithm is, can it be compared with professional camera equipment? The hardware is too poor, will the algorithm of professional manufacturers be poor?