This statement is mainly mentioned by various training schools, especially computer schools. In other words, film and television programs are animated. What is the established saying? You watch movies and pictures? Pick it up? How simple, anyone can do it, so the focus is on special effects? Or is it? Do you watch TV programs and those special effects? But in fact? Have special effects? Some movies are really rare, and TV programs are only made after revision? Opening credits? 、? A flower? Use special effects, just modify it once a year.

Second, what did you do later? Flowers? The better it looks.

What if the movie is not good? Add special effects and make some flowers! What a transition, special effects together. Many friends who do wedding programs hold this view. For flowers, but also derived a special? Template? But the problem is that what customers want to see is the content. Flowers? Actually, it's not that important to customers. Even if there is a limited bonus, some of them spend too much, and the content is unclear, but they lose points.

Third, the post-production software is editing.

In fact, there are not a few people who hold this view. Many friends who came to study film and television later suddenly realized when they were learning editing. They always thought that learning software was enough. Software is a tool. Although it is useful and useless, it is good or not, but the tool itself is not enough. Even if you play editing software well, you can only be a technician, at best, a good technician.

Mastering editing is editing.

Fourth, making programs depends on creativity.

This is a popular view, plus the above, what is the complete content? Use the software well, how to do the program depends on creativity. . This view is even more unreliable. Any program has its own positioning and style, which is doomed. Is it reliable by creativity? For a simple example, a 30-episode TV series will cost 50 million yuan for you to do creatively. Let's just say the whole cast is crazy.

Fifth, making programs depends on technology.

Whoever cuts the program well is good at technology. It's actually good that you think so. Why? When it comes to skills, that is to say, the distance between the master and himself is very limited. Is it enough to spend a few days learning the complicated technology? Of course it's a good idea, but it's unrealistic! You know, to build a house, you have to lay the foundation, and so does the cutting procedure. It's OK to study for three or four days, but it's actually insulting yourself. The industry you are engaged in is too worthless. Are you involved in this? Summit? 、? Lecture tour? Our friend is very experienced.

Five misunderstandings about film and television post-production, Bian Xiao, Ivy League, would like to share with you here. If you have a strong interest in the later stage of film and television, I hope this article can help you If you want to know more about who believes in that skill, the method and material of post-editing, you can click on other articles on this website to learn.