China has a word? Tiger poison doesn't eat children? There are many bandits in the world who kill people without blinking an eye, but they still have a gentle side to their children. For example, Bai Baoshan and Zhang Jun, the top ten bandits in China, all killed people without blinking an eye, but none of them did not love their children.
Why? Because although these people are cruel, they can finally find a trace of humanity, and that is to their families. Then they can only be counted as individuals.
Even killed his own family, especially his own flesh and blood, this? Species? It is even scarier than the fiercest bandits, because there is no trace of humanity in them, and their moral decay is thorough and creepy. Don't even let go of your own flesh and blood, not to mention other people in society.
This is it? Species? It is dangerous to stay in the world, and it will harm society sooner or later. From the standpoint of the people, everyone hopes that it can execute the death penalty.
Say it again! Judging from the case itself, the death penalty should also be executed!
Although they gave the children life, they have no right to take it back. After a child is born, he is also an independent individual, a citizen of China, and should be protected by national laws.
The cause of the incident was that there was a contradiction between the man and the woman because of the child's support, which led to the man's emotional anger and vented it on the child, while the woman saw that the child was lifted over her head and fell heavily. Instead of stopping her, she took out her mobile phone and made a video.
One person fell and one person was shot, which not only caused the 2-year-old boy to die after being sent to hospital, but also made the video spread on the Internet. The impact on society is extremely bad. Both of these acts constitute crimes.
Are you online? Killing children? In the process, the man was extremely cruel. Although the child has been crying, he was thrown over his head twice in 7 seconds. Until the child's crying is no longer heard. Someone mentioned men's motives. He just taught children at first, or he wanted to kill them from the beginning. I don't think it's necessary to dwell on this issue.
How can a two-year-old child survive such a violent fall? This is basic common sense, which the man can't understand. Obviously constitutes the crime of intentional homicide, and the circumstances are extremely bad. The conditions for the death penalty have been met. When a woman sees a child being thrown, she doesn't come forward to stop it. It also belongs to acquiescence to the man's behavior and is an accomplice. She should also be sentenced to the corresponding criminal law.