Legal analysis: the way to deal with the overlord clause is as follows: first, negotiate with the operator. Point out the irrationality of the overlord clause, communicate with each other and strive for mutual agreement; Second, if the operator refuses to recognize the overlord clause, or explicitly refuses to revoke the overlord clause, he can complain to the local consumer association and seek mediation from the consumer association. To be exact, it is not a legal concept, but an emotional expression with a very strong emotional color. In legal theory, the corresponding concept is "format contract", that is, a contract with terms drawn up in advance without mutual consultation and reuse. Generally, it refers to the contract format clauses that exempt or limit its liability, aggravate the other party's liability and exclude the other party's main rights. Standard terms are contract terms drawn up by the parties in advance for reuse, and they are not negotiated by both parties when concluding the contract. The standard terms are formulated by one party in advance and accepted by an unspecified third party, which has the characteristics of integrity and stereotype. Although the counterpart did not participate in the formulation of the contract, he could only agree or reject the contents of the contract in general, but could not modify or change the contents of the contract.

Legal basis: Article 24 of the Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests. Operators shall not make unfair and unreasonable provisions to consumers in the form of format contracts, notices, statements, store notices, etc. Or reduce the civil liability that rabbits should bear in addition to harming the legitimate rights and interests of consumers.