This kind of thing really happened in the countryside. Many people think it should not be the owner's problem. Some people even think that it is a bit inhuman to let the families of the deceased pay compensation. People will say that you love drinking and can't control yourself. You can only blame yourself and others for drinking. Most people in rural areas will think so. This can be regarded as a conventional concept. However, he is a dead man after all. As long as we investigate the families of the deceased, we must rise to the height of the law. Not the kind of ideas that some rural people take for granted. They must act according to the law. ?
The family of the deceased should compensate the host family of the banquet, which is his due right given by law. Don't you think the host of the banquet is wronged or wronged?
First of all, as the host of the banquet, if someone dies, he will bear part of the responsibility. Because you hosted a banquet, someone died at your banquet. Who is responsible if you are not responsible? It is unreasonable to be irresponsible for public and private affairs, so there is no doubt that the host of the banquet is also involved. The family of the deceased must be the first person to claim compensation from the owner?
Secondly, the family members of the deceased can also claim compensation from those who drink at the same table as the deceased, especially those who advise the deceased to drink more, and they should also bear direct liability for compensation. As long as the court obtains evidence and witnesses to prove that he drank too much because of some wine-persuading behaviors, which led to his drinking too much and became the direct cause of his death, then none of these wine-persuading people can escape. These persuaders may compensate the families of the deceased more than the host family who presided over the banquet. So no matter what the occasion, it is best not to persuade the deceased to drink. There are risks, and drinking is responsible. ?
Finally, due to the tragedy, the family of the deceased claimed compensation from the family of the owner. Should the two sides negotiate compensation, or should they solve this compensation problem through law? See how the two sides look at each other.
The two companies negotiate compensation, as long as the amount of compensation is affordable to the other party and no legal solution is needed. If the two sides fail to negotiate, they need to solve it through law. Then, the owner of the banquet has no responsibility to compensate the families of the deceased. The person who persuaded the wine on the spot should also make a compensation response. Here, I will tell you a real case. There is a friend in my hometown who is engaged in the installation of water and electricity in commercial housing. As long as a building is completed, the next water and electricity installation is his job?
Worried that something was stolen from the construction site, someone needed to watch the scene. So, his friend suggested to him that his 60-year-old father was free at home and could accompany him to the game. It's our own. So, the boss who installed water and electricity agreed to his friend's request. My friend's father worked here for half a month. Suddenly one day, he died on the construction site because of a heart attack. The owner of water and electricity installation quickly called this friend to explain the tragedy?
This friend did not claim compensation from the owner of water and electricity installation, but the owner engaged in water and electricity installation. Considering that he lost his life on his own construction site, although it was not his own responsibility, the relationship between people and friends was not investigated. Finally, he consulted a friend, and the boss who engaged in water and electricity installation took out 40 thousand yuan as compensation. You said that the boss who installed water and electricity didn't lose money, but he thought his friend's father was at home and made some money. I didn't expect to die on my own construction site in less than a month. Who should I reason with? This is a good friendship. The family of the deceased did not make compensation, or even made legal compensation, otherwise we don't know how much compensation.
Therefore, it is now a society ruled by law. When something goes wrong, most people resolve disputes through legal channels. Now, whether it's a funeral or a happy event in the countryside, everyone has learned how to set up a banquet skillfully. Drink if you can, and I don't strongly recommend it if you can't. I'm afraid that if something goes wrong, the persuader will muddle through.