The budget is around 135 F2 8000, and 851.4g11000. I said licensed products, so the difference is nearly 4000. As far as my feeling is concerned, 85 is really excellent, the big aperture is very transparent, and the large-caliber gold ring is very bright, but it is not worth the difference of 4000. Of course, if it is not bad, you can ignore this one.
The most attractive thing about 135 F2 and 105 F2 is DC, which is the "defocusing function". This is very attractive, but the same large aperture lens can't achieve this. Defocus is also a double-edged sword, because manual control also requires technology. "This is what my teacher said. Speaking of imaging, 135 and 105 can definitely be described as "working body". Although I borrowed my friend's 135 to shoot all morning, I was impressed. I think it's okay to kill my small bamboo cannon, but the control and focusing speed of fully opening the purple edge of F2 are slightly lacking. Who is the old lens? As for 135 and 105, apart from the difference of 30mm, the blur energy is stronger. Some people say that 105 is light in imaging and 135 is imaging oil. This is still inconclusive. Generally speaking, 135 F2 is recommended, and telephoto is only for blurring.
As for 135 and 85, there is no need to argue about who is the best imaging. 135 is an old man in the 1990s, the price is 8000, 85 is the top gold lens released by 10, and the price is around1000, which is often out of stock. 85 is the golden focus of portrait, and 135 is more suitable for portrait close-ups, catwalk weddings and artistic sketches. Generally speaking, it depends on your budget+demand.