It is really difficult to define whether it is the original cultural discovery.
If defined from the perspective of myths and legends, many countries and nations in the world have ancient legends about the birth of the universe and the opening of the earth. if
From this perspective, it is impossible to tell who is old and who is not. If it is determined by the latest civilization definition standards commonly used in archaeology at present.
Words. Then there are many tricks to use. It is also easy to falsely exaggerate the history of an ancient civilization.
According to the standards and viewpoints of civilization defined by westerners. The criteria for judging the emergence of civilization must have the following elements-the emergence of cities, literally.
Produce, the establishment of the national system. One of the most important prerequisites is the emergence of cities, which can be said to be the birthplace of civilization.
Taking this as a standard, westerners have established a time series diagram of the establishment of ancient civilization. The chart is arranged as follows:
Sumerian civilization-two river basins-was about 3500 BC.
Ancient Egyptian civilization-Nile valley-about 3000 BC.
Ancient Babylonian civilization-two river basins-about 3000-2500 BC.
Ancient Indian civilizations-Indus and Ganges-were around 2500 BC.
The ancient civilization of China-the Yellow River and the Yangtze River valley-was about 2070 BC.
Ancient Greek civilization-Aegean Sea and Crete Island-is about 2000 BC.
Once this statement spread, it caused great influence in western society. Many people touted it as an international standard and wrote it in the West.
In human history textbooks. After accepting this idea, some foreign slaveholder scholars in China agreed with it very much and publicized it in China, which also caused great confusion.
I think this statement is really true. So in fact, are the heirs of these ancient civilizations really willing to accept and admit this statement?
In ancient Egypt, for example, Egyptians were extremely dissatisfied with this reaction and sneered at this new "civilization" theory. Before the birth of this new civilization theory, Egypt one
It has always been considered by the world as the earliest country with civilization. For a time, some western scholars even regarded it as the source of all civilizations and thought that the world was different.
Other civilizations on earth spread from here and influenced the world. Later, due to the great differences between other civilizations and Egyptian civilization, and
I have to give up this statement.
As far as the world's popular view of studying the process of human civilization is concerned. The ancient civilizations in the world were born 7000-4000 years ago, and changed from Neolithic Age to Neolithic Age.
Generation entered the bronze age, and then entered the iron age. Slavery is adopted in most social systems, and state power came into being later. Nome in ancient Egypt is considered to be
Wei is the earliest known civilization in the world.
Nome era is about 4000-3500 BC. Class differentiation appeared in ancient Egypt, and the earliest city-state form appeared everywhere, Nome's
The area is not large, most of them are transformed from tribes or tribal alliances, and there is a city on the main road. The king is the supreme military leader of this country.
Collar, and the chief priests and the supreme judge. This is a small country with the city as the center and some villages around it. At that time, there were about 40 nomes in Egypt.
There are often wars between nomes.
Only by this standard, it is obvious that the history of ancient Egyptian civilization is not much different from the so-called Sumerian civilization.
In Asia, Indians' recognition of this statement is also quite limited, so they will not give up. In 2002, Indians made a century-old archaeological discovery.
An ancient town site was discovered in the waters near Kambei Bay, Gujarat, on the west coast of India. According to preliminary judgment, the site existed about 9000 years ago.
A few years ago. Archaeologists excavated a batch of ancient cultural relics from this ancient town sleeping under the sea, including broken ancient human teeth, animal bones,
Pieces of woodwork and pottery. From the pictures of the new ruins, we can vaguely distinguish those places where there were human civilization facilities such as stairs, bathrooms and temples.
Stone. According to historical records, there used to be a 9-kilometer-long river near this site, and this ancient town was built along the river. Archaeologists returned it from a new location.
What's on display now are the objects from the famous "Harappa civilization" period. The "Harappa civilization" in Pakistan is the earliest known ancient civilization in South Asia.
Time magazine. It has a history of more than 5000 years. This is an important archaeological discovery, which sensationalized the world as early as the 20th century. Only in this way, India
The age of civilization is no less than that of ancient Egypt and Babylon before it. However, some western scholars deliberately regard this as.
However, the argument that Indian civilization originated from other civilizations has been constantly promoted in the international community, even in India, a country with backward modern archaeological industry.
During this period, the promotion of ancient Indian civilization in the world can only be traced back to 1000 BC at most, and the previous history is not recognized.
Finally, I returned to China, just like an Indian. China has also been strongly questioned and encountered by western mainstream media and the so-called international community.
The same humiliating heckling and embarrassment. Because China's early archaeological career was far behind the western world, many western scholars were right for a long time.
The long-standing orthodoxy and antiquity of China civilization have been strongly questioned. People with ulterior motives often throw so-called traces of Chinese civilization.
The ancient Egyptian theory, the ancient Asian theory, the ancient Indian theory, the Mayan theory and even the so-called Koryo theory thrown by a ridiculous nation in recent years are all determined to give Chinese civilization.
Looking for a foreign mother, it seems impossible for China to spontaneously produce civilization. First of all, it completely denies China's legitimacy in the origin of civilization.
Xia Wenming
In China, there were Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties in ancient times. Because of the long history, the documents we left behind at least describe the Xia Dynasty, and many historical facts cannot be distinguished clearly.
Don't. Although all kinds of books handed down from ancient times are recorded, they also tell future generations that there was a Xia Dynasty before the Shang Dynasty, but what was the Xia Dynasty like, and what people are there today?
Nobody knows. So such a puzzle has been placed in front of the archaeological interface of China for a long time, becoming an insurmountable thorn, which makes countless scholars sleepless.
The food tastes terrible. Some scholars with ulterior motives in the west found China's embarrassment, so they put forward an ancient China with no Xia Dynasty and no Chinese language.
The starting point of Ming history should start from Shang Dynasty. And he wrote this hypothesis into his own history textbook, which was widely publicized around the world and caused extremely bad influence.
Influence. So for a long time, some so-called western scholars set the beginning of China civilization as BC 1500, which was a long way from birth.
Originated from ancient Greece. Later, the China Xia, Shang and Zhou Dynasties Dating Project solved the starting time of the Xia Dynasty, and the emergence of Chinese civilization had to be defined as Gong.
In 2070 BC.
So did Chinese Wen Mingzhen only originate in 2070 BC? Look at the archaeological discoveries in China in recent years. Obviously, such an answer is completely wrong.
Yes
The first is writing. What is the earliest written language in China? It is neither the Oracle Bone Inscriptions of Yin Ruins discovered in the past, nor the ancient Shu discovered in Sanxingdui site before this.
Bashu dialect of Yi nationality is a descriptive writing created by the ancient Yi people of Yi ancestors about 12000 to 10000 years ago. And followed by, there are primitive ancient times.
The magical "female script" with similar basic strokes and word-making methods in Yi language.
As the only female script found in the world, Nvshu has been used by local women for thousands of years.
In addition, the magical "carved heavenly book" discovered in northern Henan has a history of more than 4,000 years, much earlier than Oracle Bone Inscriptions in the Yin Ruins. And Henan.
Oracle Bone Inscriptions and stone carvings unearthed in Wuyang have a history of 89,000 years.
In fact, this proves that there were mature characters in China long before the Shang Dynasty, and the time of using characters far exceeded all known characters.
Ancient civilization.
Even the so-called Sumerian civilization claimed by foreign slave scholars has a history of only 5,000 years, and its age is only related to Bashu Yu Tu and stone carvings.
The age of the book is similar. It can't be compared with China's complete and complicated hieroglyphic system.
Look at metal smelting again. Looking at all archaeological materials, you will find that the exact time of the earliest metallurgy in the world is almost impossible to find, and most of the materials are marked in this way.
From 4000 BC to 3000 BC, ancient Egypt, southwest Asia, China, southern Europe and central Europe began to smelt copper with ore, which dazzled foreign slave scholars.
What about the Sumerian civilization of God? Almost at the same time, there is no accurate judgment time. So, is it true that foreigners' metal smelting is smelting, while China's?
China people's metal smelting is not called smelting, or foreigners' metal smelting is called level, while China people's metal smelting has no technical content.
? All right, let's look for technical information again. As a result, we can find that there were two most advanced metallurgical civilizations in the world at that time, one in the Middle East.
And the other is in China! In Egypt and Mesopotamia in the Middle East, copper containers filled with nickel or arsenic are used for smelting, and their processes are casting, cold working and reprocessing.
It's on fire. The characteristics of copper smelting technology, including nickel and arsenic, had great influence and later spread to India and Europe. It was not until one or two thousand years later that they switched to tin bronze. manufacture
The stability of tin bronze smelting is much higher than that of nickel, arsenic and copper, and the forged weapon has stronger performance, which is a great progress in metallurgical technology. In China,
Tin bronze was always forged and smelted in Shang Dynasty, and copper was first smelted by hydrometallurgy in the world, with the same technical content as that of the same period.
Far beyond other civilizations in the world. Foreign slave scholars often turn a blind eye to this, but they can talk big, claiming that ancient China is fundamental
Without metallurgy, "I just found some stone age relics such as stone tools, bone tools, wood products, pottery, crops, etc." Think it will deceive me.
It's ridiculous that people believe this world.
Finally, speaking of cities. There were three generations of Xia, Shang and Zhou in ancient China. Because of the long history, the literature we left behind has the least description of the Xia Dynasty and a lot of history.
Can't tell clearly. Although all kinds of books handed down from ancient times recorded and told future generations that there was a Xia Dynasty before Shang Dynasty, what was it like?
Son, people don't know anyone nowadays. So such a puzzle has been placed in front of the archaeological interface of China for a long time and has become an insurmountable thorn.
Numerous scholars have insomnia. Some scholars with ulterior motives in the west discovered China's embarrassment, so they put forward an ancient China with malicious intent.
Without Xia Dynasty, the starting point of China's civilization history should start from Shang Dynasty. This assumption was written into his own history textbook and widely publicized around the world.
, caused a very bad influence. Some so-called foreign slave scholars quickly absorbed this argument and made it clear that it was widely publicized in China.
It has caused great confusion and bad influence among the people. The important evidence that they rely on to support this argument is that there were no cities in China before Shang Dynasty.
. Is there really no city? Let's keep looking.
Let's not talk about distance for the time being Let's say Erlitou civilization, China people have already discovered it. It is called "archaeological site" by some foreign slave scholars
Several mud piles ",this is the" rammed earth remains "of the most primitive technology used to build huts in a primitive village. Then let's take a look at this "rammed earth relic"
What is it like? Is it really a primitive village? Let's keep looking. Judging from the unearthed scale of Erlitou site, the total area is 3 million square meters.
There are cities, palaces and tombs. The largest palace is 1 1,000 square meters, and the periphery of the palace area is drilled in two directions: east and west and 1 north and south.
Two vertically intersecting avenues. Among them, the length of the North-South Avenue is nearly 700 meters, the length of the East-West Avenue is more than 300 meters, and the three avenues are dense.
Site group of rammed earth building foundation. Wow, this place is just a primitive village. Is the primitive village in China really not magical? You go and see Crete.
The "Knossos Palace" boasted by foreign slave scholars on the island is more magnificent than most palaces in China after 4000 years. This palace covers an area of 3.
Acres, perhaps just a little bigger than a luxury villa built by a rich man in modern times, but people can claim to be a brilliant king.
Palace, this is the gap between China and foreign countries. Gee, really can't compare.
Of course, if the Erlitou site is mentioned, many people may already know or have heard of it, and it is nothing unusual and not worthy of attention. Then I'll say we've been the most.
Some new archaeological discoveries.
Let's start with a world-famous Sanxingdui site. The site of this civilization was praised all over the world, and later, with the continuous expansion of archaeological excavations, people discovered this site.
It's not just two large sacrificial pits discovered before, but a huge ancient city. The ruins of the city wall are found on three sides, coming from the architectural style.
China's unique Fangcheng architectural style has been revealed, which shows that its fortification technology is obviously mature.
In Liangzhu, Zhejiang, China later discovered the ruins of the ancient city from 3300 BC to 2500 BC. This site is the earliest urban heritage discovered in China.
The address has a history of more than 5000 years, long before the Shang Dynasty. It can also be regarded as one of the earliest cities in the world. Compared with Sumer,
The Stone Town established by China people in 3500 BC was almost the same period. It's just that Sumerians used local boulders to build cities, while China used.
Relatively civilized, we learned to burn bricks and build strong walls and houses with brick soil. It's just that brick soil is perishable, and it's not easy to see the original until today.
The original appearance, so in the eyes of foreign slaves became a damn crime, it seems that foreign stone cities can be called cities, while China's brick city is just
It's a pool of mud. China people pay attention to the harmony between man and nature, and knew how to build buildings with geomantic omen as early as 10,000 years ago, which has better protected nature.
Less damage, so civilization has survived to this day. Sumerian civilization hollowed out the mountain and destroyed itself in order to build its own city with huge stones.
The living ecological environment led to the catastrophic destruction of civilization, thus leaving an empty city of unknown origin for westerners to look for.
The world announced loudly. As a result, some foreign slave scholars also reacted and thought it was the success and miracle of foreign civilizations, but they didn't know it was the greatest of these civilizations.
Sadness and irony.
Therefore, Sumerian civilization, which can be regarded as the beginning of civilization, and ancient Greece, which was deliberately elevated by western scholars and seemed to be almost neck and neck with Chinese civilization.
Civilization, is the time they set satisfactory? Obviously, not many people are satisfied. Some western scholars have claimed that the so-called
Sumerian civilization dates back at least 10000 to 9000 years ago, and some scholars who study ancient Greek civilization also put forward Greece.
The time of civilization does not lag behind Egypt and the two river basins, and the earliest existence can be traced back to 3500 BC, more than 5000 years ago.
History. Unfortunately, such a statement lacks convincing evidence and can only spread through obscure paths, but it still has a far-reaching impact in the western world.
* * * Ming. Why is this?
Actually, to put it bluntly, there is only one reason. Some western scholars trumpeted that the ancient Sumerian civilization was actually a white civilization and the origin of European civilization.
Land; Similarly, ancient Greek civilization had a far-reaching influence on Europe, and it has always been regarded as the cradle of western civilization in history. And because of the western civilization in the world at present
In order to advocate white civilization and white racial supremacism, some scholars deliberately exaggerate and exaggerate these, and regard them as the source of white civilization.
Ancient civilizations, in order to satisfy their false and ridiculous vanity, take it for granted that white people rule the world.