Does the woman's father know what is wrong? The question is not how many people you have married, and you can't embarrass each other at this moment. You raised a wayward daughter, wayward you.
I think we should bear civil liability.
I have lived for more than forty years. I first heard that the reason why the bride refused to get on the wedding car on the wedding day was that the underwear the groom bought was too small! Big or small, what did you do in the early days? Life will be happy after the underwear size is just right, but life will be bad after the underwear size is big or small? If it's not that serious, is it okay?
Of course, Rome was not built in a day. In that case, there must have been a contradiction before. No matter which side caused the previous conflict, the bride should not be born on the wedding day. Because the groom's family is full of guests, a wedding banquet has been arranged. Mother refused to attend the wedding without getting on the wedding car, which was a naked slap in the face. The bride must bear the necessary responsibility for her wrong behavior.
Does the woman's underwear size not match? Then she doesn't have any other suitable underwear? Are you naked and waiting for your mother-in-law to buy underwear? For this reason, isn't this woman and her family education just a matter of underwear? How to deal with various problems in daily life in the future, how to deal with the simplest salty, light, sour, sweet, spicy, cold, hot, cool, hot, soft, hard, dry, thin and so on? Therefore, this kind of woman can't marry even if she gets on the wedding car! Fortunately, the exposure time is too late, otherwise, the man will marry a poisonous snake? This woman is suspected to have a motive for cheating on marriage? Support the man and take him to court!
Zunyi, a newcomer who is ready to enter the marriage hall, is struggling with the size of underwear. Eventually led to the cancellation of the wedding. It has become a hot topic on the Internet.
In general, if the underwear that the man bought for the bride-to-be doesn't fit, the woman can understand. Will not deliberately take nature to the side, take it to the table as a matter of time to win or lose. It can only be said that the two sides have not yet reached the mature conditions for marriage.
If this thing is really like what the woman said, it was deliberately done by the man, giving the woman a duel. Explain that the man still has problems with the woman's request for consent to marriage, and intends to give the other party a warning.
Of course, the woman's dissatisfaction with the man is not ruled out. Surfing the Internet through inappropriate underwear. I just found out that the man was desperate and didn't want to compromise. This trick is screwed up.
Nowadays, many married people are women who deliberately set up obstacles on the wedding day. In order to win the last face in front of her in-laws, the woman deliberately made trouble and gave the man a duel. Explain that the woman is not super confident.
When they got married, they immediately became a family. They shouldn't do everything for each other, they become an indispensable part of their relatives walking around each other. Pushing things to a dead end is not good for parents and newcomers.
The nature of responsibility is not clear, but I think it should be responsible. Married, the woman can refuse if she doesn't want to be slept. This cannot be forced. There is a law. This is also a problem of separating the two. But the wedding was agreed by both families, which is a fact and must be observed. Whoever goes back on his word will bear the main responsibility.
First: illegal behavior.
Whether the woman's behavior is illegal. This question is the key. Whether the woman violates the law in civil matters depends on what she thinks. Obtaining a marriage certificate and agreeing on the date of the wedding ceremony can be regarded as a civil agreement. If the woman fails to act according to the agreement, it can be regarded as inaction and breach of contract.
Second: damage the facts. It is an undeniable fact that men must lose their hotel manners. It is undeniable that it does not include mental loss, but only material loss, and it is also true.
Third: Causality. The woman's refusal to marry the man has a direct causal relationship with the man's factual loss. It's also true.
Fourth: the fault of the supervisor. The woman clearly knows that marriage is two-sided, and you can get married only if you love me. Get a license, agree on the date of the wedding ceremony, and refuse the man to get married. The woman should be well aware of the preparations and work made by the man for marriage. If he refuses, what will the man suffer? Therefore, the woman is at fault.
According to the above situation, the man has the right to claim compensation from the woman through legal channels, and at least he can ask the woman to bear half of the economic losses.
See your wedding as a constraint on the man's work, and your childish waywardness as a bet on your happiness in life. What else can you dare not gamble? Is it really worth it? Don't think that the wayward result is just to let others pay the bill, not to mention that you have planted bitter fruit for yourself!
Can I wear underwear in my freshman and junior year? Endure it and it will pass. Because of this matter, it is willful, and it is difficult for giants to find each other, which has caused the current result. The woman is the maker of this incident and bears an unshirkable responsibility. It should be judged morally and sanctioned economically. On the basis of returning the bride price after payment, it should also compensate the man for all the expenses of the wedding celebration, including the wedding company, wedding motorcade, hotel banquet, etc. We can't tolerate the woman breaking the contract at will on the pretext of underwear size, which will cause great losses to the man.