1. According to the standard of control level, GH5 is already very good. For example, 1/8000 second professional mechanical shutter,116000 second electronic shutter, 5+2 dual anti-shake system, 3.68 million pixel viewfinder, etc. The hardware configuration basically conforms to the flagship level. Although GH5 focusing system only has 225-point contrast detection, compared with other high-end 300-point integrated phase difference focusing, there is a gap in parameters, but the difference is not obvious due to Panasonic's powerful focusing technology;

2. According to the standard of static imaging, GH5 is not very good. Although Panasonic's ADC (Analog-to-Digital Conversion Technology) and SNR (Imaging Signal-to-Noise Ratio Technology) are leading in the industry, and the purity of image quality is first-class, especially GH5. However, Panasonic's reflective (micro-single) cameras all use 4/3 format sensors, and the lack of image field area is a physical defect, which cannot be completely compensated by technology alone. Therefore, under the premise of using the same quality lens, the static imaging (photo) of GH5. Moreover, due to the limitation of image plane (sensor area), the shallowest depth of field is not very good. In addition, due to the technical reasons of image processor, there are still many shortcomings compared with other optical enterprises such as Leica, Canon, Nikon and Pentax Ricoh.

According to the standard of video quality, GH5 is the best of all cameras, and there is no one. Panasonic's video technology is always ahead, not only is it the only camera that can shoot video without time limit, but also the video sampling rate is very high. GH5 can shoot 4K400Mbps video, which is the best camera at present. 4K video is ahead of any other manufacturer in gameplay and shooting.

According to the standard of cost performance, GH5 is not good, it is too expensive.