I don't think so. I don't think so online. Some people say beyond plagiarized, saying that many songs were plagiarized. I'll crack them one by one, but it's not plagiarism. They have been talking a lot. I searched, and all they can say is crazy villas, Arab dancers and metal crazy people. They said that the madman's villa copied a Japanese song called Scar, but after searching, they found that the madman's villa was produced by 1993 and Scar was produced by 1996 (this is obviously beyond black).

They also said that "The Arab Dancer" copied "Kill an Arab" and it was exactly the same. As a result, when I heard it, it was exactly the same. Great difference! (I am speechless! They deliberately hacked beyond, giving fans who don't like to investigate the illusion. And they all seem to be Middle Eastern-style songs. Even if they have to be the same, they are still the same. If this is plagiarism, aren't all singers in the world plagiarized?

And metal maniacs. In the prelude of this song, there is a passage borrowed from the world famous song "Meditation". You can go to Baidu to discuss the difference between borrowing and copying. My language skills are not good. For example. If I copy a few paragraphs from my classmates' articles (without their consent) into my own articles, it is plagiarism. If I copy a few paragraphs from the Analects of Confucius into my own article, it is for reference. Is different. And you tried to draw beyond's own overture! I only quoted a little,,, and even if beyond wanted to copy it, he couldn't copy the world famous songs! There are many people who listen to world famous songs, just as we can't copy the Analects of Confucius no matter how we write articles. It's simple. They used the wrong words, which gave us the illusion of transcending plagiarism. )

Don't be fooled by those who like black beyond. I believe beyond and their original music.