Second, the best way to protect yourself, children and future generations is not to be tempted by secular interests and not to bind mentally retarded children with feudal ethics. For this kind of marriage without a happy ending, its appearance is bound to be accompanied by social products and personal thoughts. In the increasingly commercialized life, people expect to pursue better people and things, and marriage, with the gradual elimination of feudal society, the nature of the wedding has naturally changed. In the face of this wedding, if the parents of mentally retarded children can not be bound by secular regulations and give them more human rights freedom, perhaps this wedding will not exist, and parents, children and the next generation will not be entangled in the rope of life.
Third, the aunt of the frying pan at the wedding scene can also understand from the side that they hope that the parents of mentally retarded children can give more tolerance to their children and themselves. As the "audience" of the wedding, we have no right to stop the wedding, but we hope that the parents of mentally retarded children will not support it? Hold this wedding; Children are not picture workbooks, so we can't draw anything for them. There is nothing wrong with these two retarded people. They just don't have the normal mind to resist this secular temptation. As parents, what they lack is to tolerate their own congenital mistakes and the unusual life of mentally retarded children, rather than forcing them to get married and have children like normal people.
As parents of children with mental retardation, they should strive for a better life for their children, not hold weddings for the mentally retarded.